It is astonishing how differently the COVID-19 pandemic has transpired in Taiwan than in other countries with equal, or what should have been equal, disease prevention capabilities.
When Taiwan largely kept the virus at its borders for most of the pandemic, it was a laudable success, but it eventually proved elusive and a few days in May brought a persistent domestic outbreak, plunging Taiwan into the “normal” of the international pandemic.
Even though the government has made mistakes, no reasonable person with knowledge of the world outside Taiwan could have believed that the nation’s defenses would continue doing a perfect-enough job forever.
Unfortunately, forever is how long COVID-19 might be staying, as there are more indicators that the virus could become endemic in the places where it is running rampant — in the US, Europe, large parts of Asia and elsewhere — or simply put: in today’s globalized world.
That scenario might be hard to stomach, maybe especially for Taiwan.
The nation should be commended for striving to return to the COVID-19 situation of before May, and those who have spent the past one-and-a-half years here might be excused for thinking that if countries had reacted to their outbreaks a little bit more like Taiwan, maybe the world would be talking about the virus in the past tense.
However, it is more likely that some trends the world has seen in the past 18 months are to continue. People will continue to contract the Delta variant, and possibly future variants, of SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 vaccine development will continue; and, unfortunately, vaccine hesitancy and a widespread unwillingness to follow prevention common sense will persist — at the state and individual levels.
Luckily, Taiwan shows relatively few signs of vaccine hesitancy. In other parts of the world, people’s individual politics often determine whether they get the vaccine, while Taiwanese “only” bicker over which vaccine brand is the best, in terms of protection, safety or, indeed, politics.
A time will surely come when most Taiwanese are vaccinated, but large parts of the world will not be, whether due to self-inflicted reasons or procurement issues, as many poorer countries are having greater difficulty than Taiwan.
The best-case scenario is that vaccines — the ones available or future vaccines — will adequately protect a widely vaccinated Taiwanese public, and those in other places who have gotten the jab.
However, a constant groundswell of infection might persist around the world, and there might be hospitalizations and fatalities on a level that many societies eventually deem normal and bearable.
How would Taiwan deal with that scenario?
For now, Taiwan might return to zero daily domestic cases — or “near-enough” zero — but the rest of the world might not, and it might not even aspire to.
Endemic COVID-19 might become a normal part of life, and remain part of every form of international exchange.
Under endemic COVID-19 conditions, would the time come that a certain level of herd immunity — which would not root out the worldwide transmission of the virus, but would reduce its impact — could be considered enough for Taiwan to allow the nation and its residents to return to international travel, restaurant dining, social gatherings and all of the things that make life worth living, if there are more, maybe significantly more, than zero cases?
Now might not be the time for that, not when only about 35 percent of Taiwanese have partial protection through vaccines.
For now, Taiwan will hopefully settle into a rhythm of single-digit daily case counts, but will the nation, once there is adequate herd immunity, be able to deal with the stubborn little outbreaks that will inevitably occur without returning to near-enough zero cases as the only possible goal?
Will Taiwan’s political camps agree on a time to let go of that goal and come up with smart ways to mitigate COVID-19, or will every small outbreak, even with herd immunity, prompt another round of political infighting over who has the correct, and only, strategy to reach zero cases?
At some point, a perfect score, and all that is necessary to keep it, will stop bringing meaningful benefits. For now it has advantages, but Taiwanese should talk about under what conditions a perfect score might stop having benefits, and how to cope with COVID-19 at that time.
The nation needs to have a conversation about the possibility of a post-pandemic world in which COVID-19 is still around.
Chris van Laak is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
RSS