When Taiwanese athletes entered the arena during the Tokyo Olympics’ opening ceremony, Mayuko Wakuda, an announcer at Japanese broadcaster NHK, said: “It’s Taiwan.” It struck a chord with all Taiwanese, who began enthusiastically sharing the clip.
Saying “all Taiwanese” might not be entirely true, because Chinese were mad, and some people who live in Taiwan, but think they are Chinese, were mad, too.
Amazingly, playing up to the Chinese Communist Party, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said that “this is not the time to push the name rectification campaign.”
Not surprisingly, he was criticized by people who asked why he would not listen to what Taiwanese, especially the young generation, want and why the KMT could not go along with public opinion for once.
When Chinese streaming giant Tencent stopped the broadcast as Taiwan entered the arena as team No. 104, and instead broadcast a talk show, Chinese Internet users also missed the entrance of team No. 108 — the Chinese team. Hopping mad, they stormed a Tencent microblog, causing it to crash. To see that Chinese completely lack self confidence and that Chinese media are so fearful of Taiwan is dumbfounding.
Representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) on July 24 said that most people think “Chinese Taipei” sounds weird, so when NHK said: “It’s Taiwan,” everyone started cheering in the representative office’s studio.
Why did the announcer say: “It’s Taiwan”? Because just as the world does not know any country by the name “Chinese Taipei,” nor do Japanese.
However, most Japanese know and like Taiwan, so when “Chinese Taipei” was announced to enter the arena, everyone was confused. Only after Wakuda added a clarifying “It’s Taiwan,” Japanese and athletes present began cheering.
Taiwan is of course Taiwan, and calling it “Chinese Taipei” is neither fish nor fowl, just as calling it Zhongguo Taibei (China, Taipei, 中國台北) or Zhongguode Taibei (China’s Taipei, 中國的台北) in Chinese is very strange.
Some “Chinese” in Taiwan think that by saying Zhonghua Taibei (Chinese Taipei, 中華台北), they would manage to trick themselves and others into believing that the Republic of China (ROC) still exists, yet they are afraid of uttering that title. It is as if they had split personalities.
It sounds odd when a media report says that “so-and-so from Tainan in Chinese Taipei won gold.” What does Tainan have to do with Taipei? What is wrong with “from Tainan in Taiwan”?
When traveling, Taiwanese — regardless of political affiliation — say “Taiwan” when someone asks where they are from, not the ROC; and all the good stuff is MIT — Made in Taiwan — not MIROC.
At the Tokyo Olympics, the NHK announcer is not the only one who says “Taiwan”: When medals are awarded, they are registered under Taiwan, and many other countries also speak of Taiwan.
People are guessing that it is about the approval of the Japanese government and its Olympic committee, but it could also have to do with Taiwan being an independent and sovereign country.
Unfortunately, Taiwan’s Olympic committee still refuses to rectify its name. When Olympic medalist Chi Cheng (紀政) in 2018 proposed a referendum on Taiwan participating under the name “Taiwan,” the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee opposed the suggestion. It is simply shameful.
The government should disentangle itself from the mess and change its name to “Taiwan Olympic Committee,” and Taiwan should face the world as Taiwan, and nothing else.
Twu Shiing-jer is chairman of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance and a former mayor of Chiayi City.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS