At Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corp’s annual general meeting last week, chairman William Wong (王文淵) unexpectedly announced his intention to step down following a re-election of the board of directors. He also unveiled his succession plan, in which vice chairman Hung Fu-yuan (洪福源) is to take over as chairman.
Many people were surprised by Wong’s announcement, until realizing that it had just been a matter of time. After all, Formosa Plastics Group’s (FPG) other major units — Formosa Plastics Corp, Nan Ya Plastics Corp and Formosa Petrochemical Corp — have taken on professional managers to run the day-to-day business.
There has been a growing consensus among FPG shareholders and clients that the conglomerate — which was founded about six decades ago by Wong’s uncle, the late tycoon Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) — should smoothly transition from a family business to a team of professional managers.
Even so, Wong is to remain as head of the group, which is likely to ensure that its business plans and operations do not markedly deviate. Without managing Formosa Chemicals’ day-to-day operations, Wong could spend more time on FPG’s long-term development and investment strategies.
The conglomerate is one of a few family empires remaining in Taiwan; they are active mainly in finance, infrastructure and traditional industries. The family’s gradual withdrawal from the FPG business shows that a carefully thought out succession plan can contribute to stable operations and sustainable development.
However, are Taiwanese family businesses prepared to put succession plans in place? A survey by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan found that the leaders of most family businesses expect the next generation to take over the business in the next five years, while 14 percent of Taiwanese family businesses are being run by professional managers, a figure likely to rise to 32 percent in five years.
While family businesses typically become successful thanks to the founder’s charisma and management skill, families tend to drift apart as they grow, and sibling rivalries or other feuds emerge over the wealth, business or management. News tends to follow soon about a split in the family business, shares secured by outside investors, an exit of experienced professionals, the business’ decline or serious damage to its reputation.
The elder owners of family businesses not only want to pass down the wealth and assets, but also their business philosophy, family spirit, corporate values and sustainable development goals so that the business continues to thrive. Time and communication are needed to effect a smooth transition, but successful transitions in leadership can equip Taiwanese companies with competitive advantages in the face of increasing global competition and challenging business environments.
In FPG’s case, the Wang family’s withdrawal from managing the subsidiaries is not expected to adversely affect operations, but it remains to be seen whether professional managers can navigate them through volatile petrochemical markets, as the industry comes under increasing pressure to protect the environment, reduce greenhouse gases and participate in carbon pricing.
Nevertheless, reducing and resolving family conflicts is key to achieving sustainability in family businesses, PwC said. A family business’ core decisionmakers should set in place an operational succession plan in advance and establish a corporate governance mechanism that accommodates family members and professional managers, as studies have shown that the quality of such efforts affect not only the efficiency and flexibility of business decisions, but also management turnover during a leadership transition.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with