It was described as a dialogue, the first high-level meeting in months between the Indian and Chinese foreign ministers to address the ongoing border aggressions that have pushed the two nuclear-armed countries to the brink of war.
However, those hoping that Wednesday last week’s meeting would help break a year-long stalemate during which 200,000 troops have built up on both sides of the Himalayan frontier were to be left unsatisfied.
Still, there was one point of agreement. As Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said: “Relations between India and China are still at a low point.”
Illustration: Mountain People
It was in June last year that following several months of rising tensions along the India-China border in the Himalayan region of Ladakh, 20 Indian soldiers and reportedly four Chinese soldiers were killed in the deadliest clash between the two countries in more than 50 years.
Forbidden from firing weapons, the two sides instead fought on the icy mountain precipice of Galwan Valley in medieval fashion, using spiked clubs and engaging in hand-to-hand combat, with several soldiers falling to their deaths.
The clash did not result in all-out declarations of war, but pledges of de-escalation and multiple rounds of failed military talks have instead been overshadowed by a year of troop, artillery and infrastructure buildup on both sides of the 3,380km-long border unlike any other time in history, even when China invaded India in 1962.
Indian army officials say that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is becoming more aggressive with every passing day. Although recent skirmishes between the two sides have been denied by the Indian government, army officials told reporters that the situation in areas of eastern Ladakh, including the Galwan Valley and Hot Springs, remained extremely tense.
“Every month there are two to three face-offs in these areas,” another army officer posted in the area said, the information corroborated by local police and intelligence officers.
“To avoid further escalations we started fencing some areas around Galwan, but Chinese objected to it and we had to remove it,” another army officer said.
The Indian Ministry of Defense and the military did not respond to requests for comment.
Indian army officers described the military buildup on the border in Ladakh as “like never before.” Government sources corroborated reports that an additional 50,000 troops as well as artillery and fighter planes, including Russian-made MiG-21s, have been deployed.
In a sign of the shift in Indian military priorities, some of the additional troops on the Chinese border, including Ladakh and the states of Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh, have come from the border with Pakistan, which for decades was India’s most turbulent frontier.
The greatest test for both sides was surviving the hostile winter, where temperatures dropped to minus-40oC. Yet Indian officers spoke of proudly staying the course, even when it got so cold that the fuel in the tanks froze. Despite the glacial temperatures, the soldiers have to stay in tents that can be moved quickly.
“We should have prefabricated living spaces given the harsh weather,” an Indian army commander posted in the region said. “But due to the unpredictability of Chinese moves, we are relying on tents, as they can be relocated quickly whenever needed.”
While Indian army officers say they cannot match the high-tech Chinese infrastructure, they at times admitted to copying their way of living.
“For instance, we saw Chinese would dig trenches and then put tents in them,” an army officer said. “We realized it helps warm up the canopy and since then we have been doing that way.”
For locals in the Indian state of Ladakh, who have spent a year witnessing soldiers, tanks, helicopters and heavy artillery brought up along the frontier, fear remains palpable.
“I hope war never breaks out here,” said Dolma Dorjay, who grew up in the village of Chushul near a sprawling army base along the line of actual control, the unmarked disputed border between India and China. “But the preparations seem to be happening for a war.”
Prior to the clash at Galwan, Dorjay and most of the villagers, who are tribal Changpa cattle herders, would take their livestock into the vast, sweeping valleys without another thought of the border and would freely mingle with the shepherds from the Chinese side.
“We would trade cattle and carpets and more with the people of the other side,” he said.
Sonam Tsering, another resident and former local councilor of Chushul, said the situation along the border was the most militarized anyone in the village could recall, with two armies appearing to be poised for attack, particularly in areas of eastern Ladakh.
“Our elders say that men and machinery were not deployed like this even in the 1962 war,” he said. “The army base in Chushul has expanded multiple times. Now people are not allowed to go near the border and tourists are banned from visiting.”
Durbuk is another strategic military base in eastern Ladakh that has vastly expanded.
The locals say that hundreds of new tents have been pitched in the past few months to accommodate more and more arriving soldiers, while new structures have been put up to shield tanks and bigger vehicles.
Deldan, who operates a guest house in Durbuk village, described how “during the night, we see large convoys of army trucks and tanks heading towards the border.”
In some of the tensest areas, a buffer zone has been agreed between Indian and Chinese troops to prevent troops coming to blows, and according to the Chinese foreign minister frontline troops have “disengaged in the Galwan Valley and the Pangong Lake area.”
However, locals say this does not reflect the reality on the ground and are dismissive of any talk of de-escalation.
In the Pangong Lake, locals say India has not regained territory where the Chinese encroached.
“The land which belonged to us is now the buffer zone,” said Padma Yangdog, a resident of Meerak, a village opposite an area of Chinese encroachment. “How have they [Chinese troops] moved back?”
As made clear when Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and Wang met at the sidelines of a gathering of foreign ministers in Tajikistan on Wednesday last week, India and China still have starkly different views on the border situation.
Jaishankar said it was only with China’s de-escalation and disengagement from the border that formerly cordial bilateral ties can be resumed.
However, Wang said that “the responsibility does not lie with China” to resolve the issue, and appeared to call on India to accept the current “status quo” in the interest of good relations.
According to Wang, despite the heavy troop presence, “the situation in the China-India border area has generally been easing.”
Brahma Chellaney, a professor of strategic studies at the Centre for Policy Research in Delhi, said it was clear India and China “are now locked in an uneasy military stalemate, and the entire frontier has become a hot border.”
“The Chinese tried to ward off India through a frenzied military buildup, but the Indians have refused to buckle,” he said.
“The fact that the Indians managed to stay put through the harsh Himalayan winter makes it quite likely that this crisis is not going to end anytime soon,” Chellaney added.
“The only way to break the stalemate is if the Chinese decide to start a war. But, as the Chinese realize, even all-out conflict is likely to still end in another stalemate,” he said.
“With India refusing to back down, the choice for China is to either quietly roll back its intrusions in areas where the biggest stand-offs are taking place,” he said. “Or to let this deadlock continue.”
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
Having deceived the world about its nuclear capabilities while preparing for an arms race, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now using its increasing nuclear forces for virtual nuclear coercion. This new threat will continue until the United States, Japan, and Taiwan can restore the CCP’s sense of fear. This dynamic is a familiar one for Taiwan. As the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) capabilities have grown, its inhibitions about conducting larger and more frequent coercive military demonstrations have shrunk. The PLA now more openly practices for the destruction of Taiwan’s democracy and the murder of its citizens. In the nuclear realm,
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]
At the conclusion of the G7 Leaders’ Summit on June 13, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who participated virtually, called for the reform of multilateral institutions as the best signal of commitment to the cause of open societies. His comments are significant in light of China’s ongoing and successful efforts to control international organizations, and, in particular, to keep Taiwan out of critical health agencies amid the COVID-19 pandemic. China’s influence over the WHO is well known. It has used this control to deny Taiwan a place at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decisionmaking body of the WHO. Taiwan’s absence