German Institute Taipei Director-General Thomas Prinz said recently that Germany is attempting to balance its relationships with Taiwan and China.
In an interview with the Central News Agency (CNA), Prinz said that “Germany has good relations with Taiwan that are based on the shared values of freedom and democracy and strong bilateral trade,” but that it also has strong economic ties to China.
“Strong” is an understatement. According to a Foreign Policy report published on Wednesday, China has become the biggest trading partner of Germany and the EU as a whole since German Chancellor Angela Merkel last year pushed other EU member states on an investment deal with China.
In the report, Center for a New American Security researcher Rachel Rizzo said: “Germany does not want to get caught in the middle of a broader geopolitical power struggle between the United States and China.”
On Tuesday, French Office in Taipei Director Jean-Francois Casabonne-Masonnave told CNA that the perception of Taiwan in France is much better than two or three years ago due to Taiwan’s vibrant freedom and democracy.
Prinz and Casabonne-Masonnave also talked about their countries’ desire for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and sending naval vessels into the region to make a statement of support for freedom of navigation. The representatives’ statements imply that Taiwan is a valuable friend for what it represents in terms of freedom and democracy.
However, how can countries such as Germany and France claim to be democratic and champions of human rights if their economic health is reliant on their trade relationship with an authoritarian country known for human rights violations? If they are afraid to set the conditions of their relationships with China as it relates to Taiwan, how can they claim to be independent and free?
Surely it is the people of France who decide French policy, and the people of Germany who decide German policy, so why walk on eggshells? Also, why work so hard to protect a trade relationship that is extremely unbalanced and subject to the whims of an authoritarian despot?
China has imposed astronomically high tariffs on Australian wine, beef, barley and coal after Australian officials called for an investigation into the origin of COVID-19. China also cut off imports of Canadian canola and meat products after Canada arrested Huawei Technologies Co chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟) following a US request for her extradition. Who is to say that Beijing would not do the same to EU countries when their politicians speak up about human rights in Hong Kong or Xinjiang?
Democratic countries cannot continue to allow their economies to remain vulnerable to the whims of an authoritarian government, or to allow their private companies and citizens to be silenced on human rights issues for fear of upsetting one. It is imperative that democracies stand up for their values and conduct themselves diplomatically without coercion.
It is clear that China will continue to act in ways that are incompatible with democratic values. On Tuesday, German Minister of Foreign Affairs Heiko Maas said that Russia and China had pushed political demands in delivering vaccines to other countries.
Taipei should encourage friendly nations such as France, Germany and the US to explore alternatives to China for the development of their economies, and to avoid compromising on their values for access to an imbalanced and unstable trade relationship with China. Friendly nations should bolster ties with Taiwan to send a clear message to Beijing that democracies will stand together. Acquiescing to Beijing’s demands will only encourage it to continue acting recklessly.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with