No one knows which strategies will prove most effective in the fight against COVID-19, but a meeting of Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) clearly showed the volatility of political idolatry.
Their meeting at a news conference at Taipei’s Huannan Market on Friday provided much food for thought, because Ko has apparently been competing with Chen over whose disease control strategy is more effective. Additionally, Chen is considered a potential Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate for next year’s Taipei mayoral election.
A poll conducted by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation from June 15 to 19 found that Ko’s Taiwan People’s Party garnered a 7.1 percentage point increase in support from the previous month, while the DPP’s and the main opposition Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) numbers dropped slightly.
However, the poll was conducted before the public became aware of the severity of the outbreaks at three wholesale markets. As of yesterday, the number of infections connected to these markets had surpassed 200, while the Huannan Market cluster had passed 100 cases.
The prolonged outbreak in the capital is likely to dash many people’s hopes that the pandemic alert level will be lowered after July 12.
On June 24, Ko said that the cluster at the firm’s markets was “not as bad as you think” and persisted in his strategy of using rapid virus tests before administering vaccines and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for thousands of market workers, although Chen a day earlier advised the city government to primarily use PCR testing to identify all infections at the markets.
When the city government began conducting large-scale PCR testing on Thursday last week, at least 41 cases were identified from the Huannan Market, showing that Chen’s judgement was accurate.
However, Chen, who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center, is not always correct. Over the past few months, he has drawn no less criticism for the center’s vaccination rollout and easing quarantine rules for airline crew in April, the latter considered the most likely cause of the local outbreak.
When Chen was at the peak of his popularity, he helped promote agricultural products at daily news briefings, and he was even invited by pop star Chan Ya-wen (詹雅雯) to sing at her concert at the Taipei Arena in September last year.
Political idolatry is commonplace in Taiwan, but a cruel fact is that voters can adore their idols at one moment, but spurn them at the next, if they find that their heroes are ordinary people who make mistakes and get lost in their hubris.
During the Friday news conference, even independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐), elected from Wanhua District, where the Huannan Market is located, was accused by some market vendors of paying inadequate attention to their concerns since the outbreak started, after Lim criticized Ko for his delayed virus responses.
The outbreak has accelerated the turnover rates of political stars.
Some social media users have joked that the news conference at the Huannan Market was one of the best since the outbreak started, given that it dramatically demonstrated the intriguing relationships between the central and local governments.
Other online commentators said they agreed with the vendors who chided the legislator, because they spoke the truth: The public want their normal lives back rather than more political shows.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and