China has damaged its international image with its aggressive “wolf warrior” bullying, which is alienating it from much of the world.
Facing fierce international criticism over its increasingly bellicose conduct on many issues, including Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong, as well as its unabated threats against Taiwan, the cover-up of the spread of COVID-19 from Wuhan and its expansionist designs in the South China Sea to name a few, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) recently offered a rare mea culpa when he said that it was necessary to improve Beijing’s tone when communicating to a global audience, as it raises its “international voice” in keeping with its growing status as the world’s second-largest economy.
“We must pay attention to grasp the tone, be both open and confident, but also [be] modest and humble, and strive to create a credible, lovable and respectable image of China,” Xi told a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) study meeting.
If the brilliant Dale Carnegie were alive, he would have probably handed over to the Chinese president a copy of his bestselling book How to Win Friends and Influence People.
However, For Xi it is more than just making friends — he is, apparently, more interested in having a strategic foothold, particularly in countries that continue to do heavy trading and business with China even though they frown at its repressive character.
A communique from this month’s G7 summit has, obviously, upset the Chinese leadership, although it professes to seek to repair relations with key Western powers, including the US.
China needs to move away from the brash, aggressive and often insulting tone against foreign leaders as part of its “wolf warrior” diplomacy that has been recklessly smashing the diplomatic porcelain in many countries.
It will not be easy for China to refurbish its image. It has also been treating other nations shabbily, including those that are now in China’s orbit of influence because of heavy debts and financial dependence.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken did not mince words when he criticized China’s aggressive actions abroad and how it is acting “increasingly in adversarial ways.”
Public opinion about China in many Western countries has been unfavorable. A survey last year in 14 countries — including the US, the UK, Germany and Canada — by the Pew Research Center found that “unfavorable views” of China were prevalent. Respondents were critical of China’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indeed, China has experienced a string of setbacks in the international arena. The G7 summit, for instance, was highly critical of China on a number of issues, particularly Xinjiang, Hong Kong and the Taiwan Strait.
The latest report by Amnesty International on the harsh treatment of Xinjiang’s Uighur population, describing its treatment as “dystopian bellicose,” will add to the ammunition of the large numbers of China critics around the world. Xi had hoped that the rupture created by former US president Donald Trump’s divisive transatlantic politics would enable China to further drive the wedge in the Western camp.
However, US President Joe Biden demonstrated that he could unite the other G7 partners in taking a stand against China’s aggressive global designs. The warm reception that Biden received at the G7, the EU and NATO repudiated thinking within the CCP that the West’s unity was falling apart and opening up opportunities for China to exploit the situation.
A large part of the G7 summit was dedicated to exchanging views on how to check China’s growing aggressive behavior around the world. The unfavorable China-related part of the G7 summit could not have come at a worse time for Xi, who has been rehearsing to present himself as the “people’s great leader” at the CCP’s 100th anniversary celebrations.
The G7 results might also prompt Xi’s rivals to raise critical questions on the global setbacks suffered by China.
Optics at the G7 summit were not favorable for China, which was cast in a poor light. The communique disproved the perception within the CCP that the US and its Western allies are in a state of decline. This notion was originally fed and nourished by some CCP senior members after the 2008 financial crisis.
Trump’s election win and his alienation from traditional US allies had led the CCP to believe that the Western camp was in complete disarray, and it was time to step in and fill in the breach.
This, as it turns out, was a miscalculation.
Even before the G7 summit, things were not moving according to China’s playbook. It had already suffered a major setback in early spring when the EU, reacting to the persecution of Uighurs in Xinjiang, decided to put on hold a trade agreement that had been painstakingly knitted together and was ready to be signed.
China retaliated by imposing sanctions against members of the European Parliament.
The communique snubs China by expressing support for Taiwan, underscoring the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. Xi and the CCP faction that supports him had believed, until then, that the West had placed Taiwan on the back burner and that the nation was destined to join the mainland.
Indeed, as Presidential Office spokesman Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said, this is the first time since Taiwan’s founding that there has been such a communique with “content friendly to Taiwan,” and Taiwan and the G7 member states share basic values such as democracy, freedom and human rights.
This part of the G7 communique has angered some elements of the CCP, which has stepped up its pressure against Taiwan in the past few months with regular military drills near the nation.
China faces a unified G7 and NATO on the issue, and will have to carefully weigh its options before embarking on any misadventure against Taiwan.
China will realize that its belligerent posturing has unified the world’s most important nations against it, and strengthened their resolve to fight its aggressive rhetoric and actions. China will have to reset its course and abandon its so-called “wolf warrior” diplomacy if it wants to be “credible, lovable and respectable.”
Manik Mehta is a New York-based journalist who writes extensively on foreign affairs, diplomacy, global trade and economics.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS