On Tuesday, a total of 28 People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft intruded into southwestern, southern and eastern areas of Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ), a record number since the Ministry of National Defense began publishing PLA aircraft movements last year.
Taking off from air bases on China’s east coast, 10 Shenyang J-16 multirole strike fighters, six Shenyang J-11 fighter jets and two Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early warning and control aircraft flew on a course adjacent to the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) before turning back.
In a separate formation, an assortment of aircraft, including heavy bombers, more J-16s, electronic warfare and anti-submarine aircraft, flew around the southern tip of Taiwan and into the Bashi Channel. The aircraft then made a dogleg and flew in a staggered formation part way up Taiwan’s east coast before turning back for home.
While the large number of aircraft dispatched by the PLA is concerning in itself, Tuesday’s incursion is worrisome in another respect. PLA aircraft have thus far limited themselves to the southwestern sector of Taiwan’s ADIZ during their near-daily incursions. Tuesday’s “training exercise” indicates that the PLA intends to probe Taiwan’s east coast on a regular basis. This is a significant escalation of the Chinese military’s gray-zone tactics and presents new problems for Taiwan’s military.
Taiwan’s east coast is home to Chiashan Air Base (佳山基地) in Hualien County and Chihhang Air Base (志航基地) in Taitung County. Completed in the early 1990s, Chiashan Air Base contains extensive, hardened underground facilities carved into a mountainside, with enough space to securely house more than 200 aircraft, in addition to a self-sustaining hospital, repair facilities and power supply. Chihhang Air Base contains similar facilities on a slightly smaller scale.
Both air bases, tucked away in the southeast of the nation, were designed to be out of range and able to withstand attacks by long-range ground-launched ballistic and guided missiles, launched from missile silos and mobile launchers on China’s east coast. Although the underground facilities are fitted with sophisticated blast-proof doors, it is unclear whether the bases would be vulnerable to modern aircraft-launched munitions from PLA aircraft positioned off Taiwan’s east coast.
Retired air marshal and adjunct professor at National Defense University Chang Yan-ting (張延廷) said Tuesday’s incursion into Taiwan’s eastern ADIZ, along with an intrusion into Malaysia’s Exclusive Economic Zone by 16 PLA aircraft on May 31, represents a “new normal of long-range, multi-aircraft-type training missions” and called on the nation’s military to move to an elevated state of readiness.
Taiwan’s military could be forced to respond more robustly to future PLA provocations to protect vital assets, for each time PLA aircraft encroach further into Taiwan’s ADIZ or it dispatches record numbers of aircraft, this alters the calculus for Taiwanese military commanders on the ground.
Various explanations have been offered for Tuesday’s escalation: It was a response to criticism of China by G7 nations, a reaction to last week’s visit to Taiwan by three US senators, a reaction to Tokyo and Washington’s undercutting of Beijing’s attempt to force its “one China” vaccines on Taiwan, or saber rattling in response to the USS Ronald Reagan carrier strike group entering the region on Monday.
All of these factors might have played into the PLA’s reasoning, but it is important to avoid getting stuck in the weeds of day-to-day events and instead focus on the long-term trend: Aircraft numbers, mission distances and operational tempo are all on the up. This will require some creative thinking on Taiwan’s part, including perhaps fast-tracking the development of autonomous drones to stymie further encroachment by the PLA.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS