In the past few months, Taiwan’s print media seem to have become engulfed in a “digital currency fever” — almost every day there are reports about digital currencies saying that central banks in many countries are rushing to research and issue them.
On Oct. 10 last year, the Chinese-language Economic Daily News reported that seven major national central banks, including the US Federal Reserve, had drafted principles for the issuance of central bank digital currencies (CBDC), in the hope of catching up with China.
The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) in June last year reported that Taiwan’s central bank completed a study on “wholesale CBDC feasibility technology” for large interbank transactions.
Eighty percent of central banks around the world have initiated such research, and others are taking an increasingly positive view of CBDCs.
Why are Taiwan’s — rather than Japan’s or the US’ — financial media suddenly filled with reports about digital currencies?
China is a pioneer in advocating digital currencies. The People’s Bank of China began researching them in 2014 and founded research institutes in 2017.
In April last year, it announced that internal “digital renminbi” pilot tests would be conducted in Chinese cities including Shenzhen and Beijing, the venue of next year’s Winter Olympic Games.
China believes that when digital currency technology is mature, the digital renminbi would be used for borrowing and transactions under its Belt and Road Initiative so it can bypass the US dollar-based SWIFT system.
This shows that the Chinese central bank’s acceleration of digital currency development is intended to challenge the hegemony of the US dollar.
A digital currency researcher in Beijing has said that “future international competition may focus on the field of digital finance, and digital currency could be the ultimate battlefield.”
Broadly speaking, a digital currency is an electronically realized currency, such as transactions through mobile phones or tablets via the Internet. Third-party payments such as Google Pay, Apple Pay and online banking currencies can all be counted as digital currency.
The People’s Bank of China has said that “China needs to be the first country to issue a digital currency to promote the internationalization of the renminbi and to reduce its dependence on the US dollar payment system.”
However, the digital currency the statement referred to can only be called an improvement or a new payment system for the digitization of yuan payments. The currency is still the yuan, although it is not referred to as such.
A digital currency must inevitably be based on a mechanism for issuing currency that is trusted by banks, including central banks. There is no substantial difference between what China calls a digital currency and the internationally used US dollar. The only difference is the name and their relative values.
As China’s economy grows stronger, and the conflict between the yuan and the US dollar intensifies, the question for Taiwan is which side it should take.
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to call the People’s Bank of China’s digital currency a cash card issued by China’s central bank, as that digital currency is nothing more than propaganda from Beijing and a publicity stunt.
A “cashless society” is the ultimate goal of digital authoritarian regimes to control people’s thoughts and economic behavior. It is by no means a goal pursued by the free world.
Taiwanese do not need to dance to Beijing’s tune or act as its stooges.
Huang Tien-lin is a former advisory member of the National Security Council.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS