I have always held a deep respect for the broad-mindedness and open nature of true artists, as opposed to those cold-blooded artists for hire who abandon their values for a few gold sovereigns.
The fundamental difference between these two types of artists lies in the strength of their convictions, which dictates whether they will hold fast to their beliefs when they are severely tested, or simply cast them aside as extraneous flotsam.
Chinese-American actor Ryan Jiang (姜光宇) is a Falun Gong practitioner. He received the “best actor” award at the 2019 Wales International Film Festival for his leading role in the film Origin Bound.
The film also received the “best feature film” award at the Greatest Show of All Time film festival in New York City.
Jiang has said that he views the awards as a form of recognition for the human rights issues, moral questions and values explored in the film, and that the awards give Falun Gong practitioners support, validation and encouragement in light of two decades of persecution.
Hopefully, more films that highlight similar positive values will be made in the future.
Jiang previously starred in big-name Chinese productions such as Yongzheng Dynasty (雍正王朝).
However, Jiang held fast to his principles on human rights, and when Chinese film and television production companies began to include a clause in employment contracts that require actors to renounce Falun Gong, Jiang refused to comply, which meant that work dried up and he disappeared from the Chinese market.
After leaving the Chinese entertainment industry 17 years ago, Jiang has slowly carved out a niche for himself in New York.
I have known Taiwanese actor Eddie Peng (彭于晏) and his elder sister since kindergarten. I remember that Peng always wore a sunny smile.
Peng grew up in a single-parent family with his mother raising three children.
Over a number of years, my strong sense of “Taiwaneseness” rubbed off on Peng and his sister. Before departing for Canada for schooling at the age of 13, they came to see me and say goodbye. These memories mingled with an indescribable feeling of moroseness when I learned last week that my old friend had taken the lead in advocating for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “Support Xinjiang cotton” movement.
Was he so afraid that his career in China would be affected when the CCP started its witch hunt that he had to abandon human rights and start defending authoritarianism?
The Peng I remember was warmhearted, but now I find my self questioning whether he has given up on being a conscientious actor worthy of our respect and instead become an unsentimental, party-aligned actor for hire.
Must he really submit to the whims of the CCP? The Peng I knew had a conscience and cared about human rights. Does he feel that he has no choice but to compromise his beliefs on this issue?
However, Peng and his peers are hardly short of money. Are they really reliant on China’s market for survival? How can they hold their heads high as public figures as they trample over the blood and tears of Uighurs and other ethnic minorities incarcerated in Xinjiang’s concentration camp system?
No matter how profitable their Chinese business operations are, Nike, Adidas, H&M, Uniqlo and other international brands are all free to choose not to be a part of it.
However, the agents and management companies that represent actors and entertainers, motivated entirely by profit, have rushed to issue statements in support of cotton from Xinjiang and against blacklisted brands.
The celebrities and actors who they represent are forced to morally debase themselves, as though they were mere pawns in a wider game of chess.
Outside of the Chinese market stuffed with “little pink” cybernationalists, who will respect them now?
A boycott of the world’s second-largest economy would certainly not be easy, but with Taiwan constantly subjected to Chinese suppression and running out of time to unite the public behind Taiwan’s defense, how can Taiwanese continue to work hand in glove with the wicked CCP regime?
My old friend Peng would do well to think of Jiang.
Peng has a large, young fan base in Taiwan, yet he has become the worst possible role model for them: The message he is sending is that lining one’s pockets is more important than standing up for human rights.
Perhaps he does not care so long as he can lead a comfortable life. By turning a blind eye to the crimes in Xinjiang, are Peng and his contemporaries true artists, or merely actors for hire?
Chu Meng-hsiang is an adviser to the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Edward Jones
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS