I have always held a deep respect for the broad-mindedness and open nature of true artists, as opposed to those cold-blooded artists for hire who abandon their values for a few gold sovereigns.
The fundamental difference between these two types of artists lies in the strength of their convictions, which dictates whether they will hold fast to their beliefs when they are severely tested, or simply cast them aside as extraneous flotsam.
Chinese-American actor Ryan Jiang (姜光宇) is a Falun Gong practitioner. He received the “best actor” award at the 2019 Wales International Film Festival for his leading role in the film Origin Bound.
The film also received the “best feature film” award at the Greatest Show of All Time film festival in New York City.
Jiang has said that he views the awards as a form of recognition for the human rights issues, moral questions and values explored in the film, and that the awards give Falun Gong practitioners support, validation and encouragement in light of two decades of persecution.
Hopefully, more films that highlight similar positive values will be made in the future.
Jiang previously starred in big-name Chinese productions such as Yongzheng Dynasty (雍正王朝).
However, Jiang held fast to his principles on human rights, and when Chinese film and television production companies began to include a clause in employment contracts that require actors to renounce Falun Gong, Jiang refused to comply, which meant that work dried up and he disappeared from the Chinese market.
After leaving the Chinese entertainment industry 17 years ago, Jiang has slowly carved out a niche for himself in New York.
I have known Taiwanese actor Eddie Peng (彭于晏) and his elder sister since kindergarten. I remember that Peng always wore a sunny smile.
Peng grew up in a single-parent family with his mother raising three children.
Over a number of years, my strong sense of “Taiwaneseness” rubbed off on Peng and his sister. Before departing for Canada for schooling at the age of 13, they came to see me and say goodbye. These memories mingled with an indescribable feeling of moroseness when I learned last week that my old friend had taken the lead in advocating for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “Support Xinjiang cotton” movement.
Was he so afraid that his career in China would be affected when the CCP started its witch hunt that he had to abandon human rights and start defending authoritarianism?
The Peng I remember was warmhearted, but now I find my self questioning whether he has given up on being a conscientious actor worthy of our respect and instead become an unsentimental, party-aligned actor for hire.
Must he really submit to the whims of the CCP? The Peng I knew had a conscience and cared about human rights. Does he feel that he has no choice but to compromise his beliefs on this issue?
However, Peng and his peers are hardly short of money. Are they really reliant on China’s market for survival? How can they hold their heads high as public figures as they trample over the blood and tears of Uighurs and other ethnic minorities incarcerated in Xinjiang’s concentration camp system?
No matter how profitable their Chinese business operations are, Nike, Adidas, H&M, Uniqlo and other international brands are all free to choose not to be a part of it.
However, the agents and management companies that represent actors and entertainers, motivated entirely by profit, have rushed to issue statements in support of cotton from Xinjiang and against blacklisted brands.
The celebrities and actors who they represent are forced to morally debase themselves, as though they were mere pawns in a wider game of chess.
Outside of the Chinese market stuffed with “little pink” cybernationalists, who will respect them now?
A boycott of the world’s second-largest economy would certainly not be easy, but with Taiwan constantly subjected to Chinese suppression and running out of time to unite the public behind Taiwan’s defense, how can Taiwanese continue to work hand in glove with the wicked CCP regime?
My old friend Peng would do well to think of Jiang.
Peng has a large, young fan base in Taiwan, yet he has become the worst possible role model for them: The message he is sending is that lining one’s pockets is more important than standing up for human rights.
Perhaps he does not care so long as he can lead a comfortable life. By turning a blind eye to the crimes in Xinjiang, are Peng and his contemporaries true artists, or merely actors for hire?
Chu Meng-hsiang is an adviser to the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Edward Jones
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS