Myanmar’s escalating crisis is spilling across its borders, as thousands of refugees seek safe haven in India and Thailand in the wake of the military coup and bloody crackdowns on anti-coup protesters.
Authorities in both countries have tried to block new arrivals, fearing that a steady flow might become a flood, if unrest spreading through Myanmar worsens.
A top UN official last week said that the country is “on the verge of spiraling into a failed state” if action is not taken soon to stem the bloodshed.
Illustration: Mountain People
The catastrophic human costs of the regime’s brutal policies is visible in crowded refugee camps in Bangladesh, where hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees are living. Most fled after a military campaign that began in 2017, and have lived in limbo ever since.
Last week, Thailand reportedly tried to push thousands of people fleeing Myanmar back across their border, after airstrikes on villages held by forces from the Karen ethnic minority.
Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha said the country was braced for more arrivals, the Associated Press reported.
“We don’t want to have mass migration into our territory, but we will consider human rights, too,” he said. “We have prepared some places, but we don’t want to talk about the preparation of refugee centers at the moment. We won’t go that far.”
At least one Indian border state backed away from an order last month to “politely turn away” any refugees attempting to cross.
The home ministry of Manipur said its instructions had been “misconstrued.”
A COVID-19 outbreak in the Chinese border city of Ruili, which authorities said they had traced back to virus cases imported from Myanmar, was another reminder of the risks of large cross-border movements of people in a pandemic era.
The UN’s refugee agency has highlighted Myanmar’s neighbors’ “decades-long history” of protecting refugees from the country, and issued a pointed warning that it is illegal under international law to block people seeking asylum.
“Children, women and men fleeing for their lives should be given sanctuary,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees Assistant High Commissioner for Protection Gillian Triggs said. “As the situation in Myanmar deteriorates further, we call on states to continue their lifesaving humanitarian tradition of safeguarding the lives of all those forced to flee.”
In India’s Mizoram state no reminders have been needed. Politicians and local residents have welcomed with open arms more than 1,000 people who have hiked through forests from Myanmar and waded across rivers to seek sanctuary.
A large number of them are policemen, who fled after refusing to obey orders to shoot at their own people during the protests, officials said.
At least 550 civilians have died, including 46 children, in protests that have shaken Myanmar’s major cities since the military took power in a February coup, a leading human rights group has said.
More than 2,750 people have also been detained or sentenced, Myanmar’s Assistance Association for Political Prisoners said.
Despite the crackdown, protesters have continued to pour onto the country’s streets, demanding the military respect the results of democratic elections held late last year, which gave opposition parties a landslide majority.
There is huge sympathy with both the protesters’ cause, and those who have fled over the border to Mizoram. Most refugees are members of the same ethnic group as local residents, known as Chin in Myanmar and Mizos in India.
“We are the same tribe. We share the same language and culture and religion — Christianity,” said Lalbin Sanga, assistant general secretary of the Mizo Students’ Union. “We all have family and blood ties, because, although a border and different nationalities separate us, we are effectively the same people.”
On social media, indignant Mizos have shared pro-democracy slogans and freedom songs, and a series of fundraising street music concerts in the state capital, Aizawl, drew crowds of more than 3,000 and donations of 300,000 rupees (US$4,091) to support refugees.
However, these sentiments have put the local government on a collision course with the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in New Delhi.
It has tried to categorize many of those seeking amnesty as illegal immigrants, and taken a hard line on deportations, including drawing controversy last week for trying to deport a lone teenage Rohingya girl, whose parents are refugees in Bangladesh, back to Myanmar.
Last month the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs ordered Mizoram Chief Minister Zoramthanga — who is known by one name — to check the influx of new arrivals and deport those who had already arrived.
He responded by asking Indian Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah to change government policy.
“I have told Amit Shah that the people who came from Myanmar are our brothers and sisters. We have family ties with most of them. Once they enter Mizoram, we have to give them food and shelter,” Zoramthanga said.
Few of the refugees are any financial burden on the government, because of their extensive local ties.
“The vast majority of those crossing into India don’t need help. They have moved into the homes of relatives and melted into the local population,” one local official said.
That might change if numbers grow. There are 500km of border between Mizoram and Chin, and extensive ties mean large stretches are unfenced.
It has served as a safety valve for decades, with people fleeing an insurgency in India during the 1960s and 1970s, then escaping from Myanmar after a previous military crackdown in 1989.
With protesters determined to keep challenging the Burmese government, and fears the situation in Myanmar could escalate into full-blown civil war, some in the region are already preparing for many new arrivals.
At least three armed groups from Myanmar’s ethnic minorities, which have long track records in guerrilla warfare against the central government, have vowed to join what they called the “spring revolution” if the crackdown continues.
The opposition is also working on an interim constitution, which would include a “federal army” to replace the current military system.
Although outnumbered, and outgunned, if the various opposition forces are able to come together effectively they could pose a significant challenge to the Tatmadaw, Myanmar’s military forces.
“The way things are going, I anticipate more people seeking refuge in Mizoram,” said Lawma Chhangte, president of the United for Democratic Myanmar non-governmental organization. “At the moment most of them are staying with relatives, but we have started renting a few homes in case the numbers become too large for families here to manage.”
“Testy,” “divisive,” “frigid,” “an exchange of insults” were some of the media descriptions of last month’s meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, between US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and their Chinese counterparts. Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass said that, rather than the “deft handling” needed in US-China relations, this encounter was “mishandled, a terrible start [with] way too much public signaling.” Yet, contrary to conventional wisdom, the acrimonious encounter with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) and Chinese Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) was a great success for US diplomacy
In studies of Taiwan’s demographic changes, the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica has found that a mere 36.5 percent of men and 19.6 percent of women think getting married is an important life event. The institute also found that the government spending money or amending laws and regulations in order to encourage families to have children is having no impact on the birthrate. Opinions differ on whether this kind of change is a matter of national security, as Japan faces a similar situation, without having a negative impact on its economic strength. Fewer women are willing to marry and the divorce
Interrupting the assimilation of Xinjiang’s Uighur population would result in an unmanageable national security threat to China. Numerous governments and civil society organizations around the world have accused China of massive human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and labeled Beijing’s inhumane and aggressive social re-engineering efforts in the region as “cultural genocide.” Extensive evidence shows that China’s forceful ethnic assimilation policies in Xinjiang are aimed at replacing Uighur ethnic and religious identity with a so-called scientific communist dogma and Han Chinese culture. The total assimilation of Uighurs into the larger “Chinese family” is also Beijing’s official, central purpose of its ethnic policies
Early last month, China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the National People’s Congress (NPC), officially approved the country’s 14th Five-Year Plan. The strategy was supposed to demonstrate that China has a long-term economic vision that would enable it to thrive, despite its geopolitical contest with the US. However, before the ink on the NPC’s stamp could dry, China had already begun sabotaging the plan’s chances of success. The new plan’s centerpiece is the “dual-circulation” strategy, according to which China would aim to foster growth based on domestic demand and technological self-sufficiency. This would not only reduce China’s reliance on external demand; it would also