For Taiwan, the sky is no longer the limit, or at least it appears so in light of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) focus on expanding the nation’s space program.
In August 2018, Tsai visited NASA’s Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, which made her the first Taiwanese leader to enter a US federal building in an official capacity.
Taiwan’s stride to space was boosted when Tsai, in her inaugural speech on May 20 last year, declared that space is one of the core strategic industries for public and private development. It was followed by an introduction of a draft bill on the nation’s future space ambitions. The bill proposes making the National Space Organization (NSPO) an independent agency by decoupling it from the Ministry of Science and Technology.
This was trailed by the launch of two Taiwan-made satellites — YuSat (named after Yushan, 玉山) and Ionospheric Dynamics Explorer and Attitude Subsystem Satellite (dubbed “Flying Squirrel”) — by Space X. They were launched on a Falcon 9 rocket at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on Jan. 24.
Tsai has pushed for increasing ties with countries included in the government’s New Southbound Policy in technology, one of the nation’s critical sectors, but cooperation in space technology has received less attention than it deserves.
With the administration’s commitment to furthering relationships with these countries, the time is ripe for expanding cooperation with their space programs, especially with that of India. One of the critical areas where cooperation in space could be mutually beneficial is agriculture, which is already a core sector under the policy.
Among these countries, India has one of the most active and proven space programs. The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) has launched multiple foreign payloads and is also the first country to reach Mars on its first attempt. Such a feat is not easy, especially given that ISRO’s budget is a fraction of those of other countries with similar ambitions.
It also boasts a commercial arm, New Space India Ltd. One of its critical objectives is to operate launch services, which it has been able to do successfully.
The NSPO previously sought to collaborate with India in 2018. When they met, the Taiwanese side saw immense potential in jointly tracking weather patterns — an endeavor beneficial to both as they face multiple typhoons and cyclones every year.
However, such talks have not been followed up on — or any such details have not yet been made public. One reason for this might be that the NSPO is still an agency under the Ministry of Science and Technology. Making NSPO independent would facilitate collaboration and cooperation with overseas partners, such as ISRO, in such a high-value technical industry. As an independent agency, it would also have more flexibility to form partnerships with foreign organizations without any bureaucratic delays.
Advancements in the space sector can bring about multiple positive effects for Taiwan domestically and internationally. At home, it sends a solid signal to space technology industries that the government is serious about putting policy into practice. Internationally, it would deliver a message to foreign space technology start-ups that Taiwan could be a base for their research and development. Multiple collaborations among local and foreign industries would naturally follow.
By cooperating with New Southbound Policy countries in the space sector, Taiwan can also become a key regional player in space technology education and research. Given that Taiwanese universities have a large pool of students from these countries, which has risen yearly, Taiwan can give students opportunities to pursue careers in space technologies.
By doing so, Taiwan can achieve two goals. In the short term, it will be the key attraction for space technology education in Asia. In the long term, Taiwan would be able to collaborate with some of its alumni, who will return to their countries to work in their space agencies.
With the growing bonhomie between India and Taiwan in several sectors, cooperation and partnership in the space sector would stimulate bilateral relations. Taiwan will gain from ISRO’s space launch facilities known for their cost-effectiveness. It would strengthen the bond between them. The ISRO can gain from obtaining distinctive research and environmental data from the Asia-Pacific region.
As the sky is no longer the limit, space cooperation between Taiwan and New Southbound Policy countries should be accelerated. Taiwan should diversify its partnerships in the space sector rather than solely rely on US facilities. Cooperation with these countries and India would bring innovative approaches to Taiwan’s space industry.
By investing in space technologies, Taiwan can be proud of another technology besides semiconductors, while diversifying its core competence, and strengthening its international standing and competitiveness.
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi is a research fellow at the Taiwan Nextgen Foundation.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS