On March 5, the White House announced that Columbia University professor Tim Wu (吳修銘), a second-generation Taiwanese American, was to become US President Joe Biden’s special assistant for technology and competition policy, and would be working for the White House’s National Economic Council.
The appointment has attracted a lot of attention. Wu specializes in antitrust, intellectual property and telecommunications law.
White House press secretary Jennifer Psaki said that Biden has made it clear that he intends to stand up to abuses of power, including those by big tech companies, and that Wu would help to advance that agenda.
In Taiwan, the public always takes great pride in outstanding talent overseas who are of Taiwanese descent, and in this case, Tim Wu’s father, Alan Wu (吳明達), had been placed on a blacklist for his participation in the Taiwanese independence movement.
People like these are seen to exemplify the emotional connection and the contributions that overseas Taiwanese have made to their birthplace.
Tim Wu is equally at home in academia and the real world. Educated in Canada and the US, he obtained his doctorate in law from Harvard University and, in addition to academic posts at renowned universities, he has worked in government, as well as being a legal clerk for US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.
He worked in the administration of former US president Barack Obama, and served as an academic in residence and senior policy adviser at the US Federal Trade Commission.
In 2014, Tim Wu ran as the Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor of New York, receiving 40 percent of the popular vote.
Tim Wu’s achievements outside of academia and government have been even more impressive: He was named one of “America’s 100 Most Influential Lawyers” by the National Law Journal and as one of Scientific American’s 50 people of 2006, as well as one of Harvard University’s 100 most influential graduates by 02138 magazine a year later.
His book, The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, was selected as one of the best books of 2010.
More significantly, he coined the term “net neutrality” in a 2003 paper titled “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination,” advocating for consumers’ free and fair access to the Internet, in what has become a fundamental concept of Internet standards.
In his books Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World and The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age, Tim Wu takes tech giants such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google to task, winning him the approval of the progressive arm of the Democratic Party and antitrust non-governmental organizations in the US.
His appointment does not require US Senate approval, but influential senators have expressed their support.
Tim Wu holds that excessive concentration of economic resources leads to inequality and actual harm to society as a whole, and that it is plain for all to see how the tech giants have been able to grow and expand their influence through mergers, and how they are affecting people’s everyday lives through speech, searches and e-commerce.
He compares the current situation to the “Gilded Age” of the US in the late 19th century, when the US economy was monopolized by a small number of large corporations, but says that these tech giants are unable to effectively protect their users’ data, engage in fair competition with smaller rivals, or eradicate misinformation from their online platforms.
His most widely quoted remark is aimed at users of social media and search engines, and about how they are essentially handing over their own personal information and data to these giants: “When an online service is free, you’re not the customer. You’re the product.”
During Biden’s presidential campaign, he was explicit about his intention to break up the tech giants, and expressed concern that social media enjoyed excessive protection under communications laws.
It came as no surprise that the Biden administration would want to work with the US Congress on legislation reinforcing antitrust laws, and address the economic and social challenges posed by tech platforms, strengthen competition and market forces, and break up monopolies.
Even last year, Facebook and Google were accused by the federal government and several state governments of contravening antitrust laws, and Amazon and Apple were being investigated for alleged anticompetitive practices.
The policies introduced by the administration of former US president Donald Trump to deal with the tech giants are only to be strengthened under Biden.
Tim Wu’s appointment would mean much to many Taiwanese at home and abroad.
Due to his father’s untimely death, he was raised by his Canadian mother, but he spent summers in Taiwan visiting relatives and experienced Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996, maintaining significant contacts in Taiwan and among the Taiwanese community in the US.
This Taiwanese connection and his devotion to public service were strongly influenced by his father. Tim Wu has said that he inherited his father’s anti-authoritarian ways, and these have greatly informed his connection with politics.
In Tim Wu, Taiwanese see an exemplary second-generation Taiwanese who has not forgotten his roots.
Many Taiwanese families in the US maintain their mother tongue at least into the second generation, more so than is perhaps the case in Taipei.
At the same time, they not only value their children’s education and pass on Taiwanese values, but Taiwanese Americans also encourage the next generation to integrate into mainstream society, and apply their talents to a range of sectors and industries.
Another issue that must be mentioned is the inclusion of Tim Wu’s father on the authoritarian government’s blacklist. During the Martial Law era under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime, dissidents advocating Taiwanese independence were denied visas, prohibited from entering the country, or had their passports revoked.
As a result, overseas Taiwanese were not able to return home for several decades, even to attend their parents’ funerals.
Even more pernicious, the blacklist was created by foreign representatives of the one-party state or hired “professional students,” who monitored and then reported on Taiwanese students and organizations.
They cast their net wide, and that was how Carnegie Mellon University assistant professor of statistics Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) became a victim during a visit to Taiwan.
Although the blacklist has passed into history together with the Martial Law era, the KMT refuses to admit that it existed, prohibiting the process of transitional justice from making it public and compensating the victims.
Despite all of this, overseas Taiwanese maintain an emotional bond with Taiwan.
As Taiwan moved toward liberty, democracy and human rights, they spoke up for Taiwan, and provided help and financial aid, making it possible together with the people of Taiwan.
Taiwan’s democracy was not a gift from the gods, and the assistance of overseas Taiwanese like Alan Wu must never be forgotten.
Today, they continue to fight for Taiwan through the Formosan Association for Public Affairs and other organizations as Taiwan resists China’s attempts at annexation.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Perry Svensson
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS