Moody’s Investors Service last week affirmed Taiwan’s sovereign credit rating of “Aa3” and changed its credit outlook for the nation to “positive” from “stable,” which is not only a first since the ratings agency began covering Taiwan in 1994, but also a vote of confidence in the nation’s resilient economy and its good governance model, despite US-China trade tensions and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The government welcomed the move. The Ministry of Finance said that Moody’s affirmation reflects Taiwan’s strong fiscal discipline and effectiveness of restoring economic normalcy amid the pandemic, while the outlook upgrade indicates that the nation’s sovereign rating might be upgraded within a year.
The central bank said that the agency’s assessment suggests the nation’s ample foreign-exchange reserve and its flexible exchange rate regime strengthen the economy’s shock-absorption capacity and have enhanced its monetary and macroeconomic policy effectiveness. The assessment also points to the bank’s deployment of macroprudential measures last year to ease financial risks from elevated household debt and rising property prices in some areas, it said.
The Moody’s report is just the latest assessment from global institutions giving high marks to Taiwan. The International Institute for Management Development’s annual world competitiveness report, released in June last year, gave the nation its best rating since 2016, while the institute’s global digital competitiveness survey and the corporate governance rankings by the Asian Corporate Governance Association last year also gave Taiwan its best marks in the past few years, the Executive Yuan said last week.
Despite daunting challenges at home and abroad, Taiwan has managed to keep COVID-19 at bay, and the latest data show that the economy and stock markets are stronger than those of its regional peers. However, closer scrutiny reveals that economic development has been concentrated among a few high-tech industries, especially electronics, communications and semiconductors, while the nation’s overseas shipments are still centered on China.
CRIF China Credit Information Service Ltd last week said that the Taiwanese economy faces major risks in the long term, as its exports concentrate too much on intermediate goods, the electronics and communications industry, and the Chinese market.
According to CRIF, intermediate goods accounted for 77.1 percent of Taiwan’s exports last year, while outbound shipments of capital goods and consumer goods continued to fall to 13.4 percent and 8.9 percent respectively. Exports of electronics, communication and audiovisual products accounted for 53.51 percent of last year’s total exports, compared with the machinery industry’s 6.34 percent and the optical industry’s 3.41 percent.
China remained Taiwan’s largest export market, making up 43.9 percent of the total last year, higher than the US’ 14.6 percent, as many of the goods destined for the US were still from China, it said.
CRIF warned of an unbalanced development of local industries and urges the nation to transform its export structure. Although Taiwan’s industries would still face difficulty decoupling from China, it emphasized the importance for the nation to diversify its trading partners. If things remain unchanged, Taiwan would be vulnerable to changes in the global economic climate and political situation.
The US-China trade dispute and new trends driven by the pandemic have provided an opportunity for Taiwan’s electronics and communication industries, as well as its non-tech sectors, ranging from machinery and textiles to petrochemicals and others. To capitalize on it, the government needs to help weaker industries upgrade equipment and secure more resources, including access to funds. Otherwise, despite positive assessments by global institutions and pretty economic data, not all will feel satisfied with the nation’s economic and industrial development.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS