Moody’s Investors Service last week affirmed Taiwan’s sovereign credit rating of “Aa3” and changed its credit outlook for the nation to “positive” from “stable,” which is not only a first since the ratings agency began covering Taiwan in 1994, but also a vote of confidence in the nation’s resilient economy and its good governance model, despite US-China trade tensions and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The government welcomed the move. The Ministry of Finance said that Moody’s affirmation reflects Taiwan’s strong fiscal discipline and effectiveness of restoring economic normalcy amid the pandemic, while the outlook upgrade indicates that the nation’s sovereign rating might be upgraded within a year.
The central bank said that the agency’s assessment suggests the nation’s ample foreign-exchange reserve and its flexible exchange rate regime strengthen the economy’s shock-absorption capacity and have enhanced its monetary and macroeconomic policy effectiveness. The assessment also points to the bank’s deployment of macroprudential measures last year to ease financial risks from elevated household debt and rising property prices in some areas, it said.
The Moody’s report is just the latest assessment from global institutions giving high marks to Taiwan. The International Institute for Management Development’s annual world competitiveness report, released in June last year, gave the nation its best rating since 2016, while the institute’s global digital competitiveness survey and the corporate governance rankings by the Asian Corporate Governance Association last year also gave Taiwan its best marks in the past few years, the Executive Yuan said last week.
Despite daunting challenges at home and abroad, Taiwan has managed to keep COVID-19 at bay, and the latest data show that the economy and stock markets are stronger than those of its regional peers. However, closer scrutiny reveals that economic development has been concentrated among a few high-tech industries, especially electronics, communications and semiconductors, while the nation’s overseas shipments are still centered on China.
CRIF China Credit Information Service Ltd last week said that the Taiwanese economy faces major risks in the long term, as its exports concentrate too much on intermediate goods, the electronics and communications industry, and the Chinese market.
According to CRIF, intermediate goods accounted for 77.1 percent of Taiwan’s exports last year, while outbound shipments of capital goods and consumer goods continued to fall to 13.4 percent and 8.9 percent respectively. Exports of electronics, communication and audiovisual products accounted for 53.51 percent of last year’s total exports, compared with the machinery industry’s 6.34 percent and the optical industry’s 3.41 percent.
China remained Taiwan’s largest export market, making up 43.9 percent of the total last year, higher than the US’ 14.6 percent, as many of the goods destined for the US were still from China, it said.
CRIF warned of an unbalanced development of local industries and urges the nation to transform its export structure. Although Taiwan’s industries would still face difficulty decoupling from China, it emphasized the importance for the nation to diversify its trading partners. If things remain unchanged, Taiwan would be vulnerable to changes in the global economic climate and political situation.
The US-China trade dispute and new trends driven by the pandemic have provided an opportunity for Taiwan’s electronics and communication industries, as well as its non-tech sectors, ranging from machinery and textiles to petrochemicals and others. To capitalize on it, the government needs to help weaker industries upgrade equipment and secure more resources, including access to funds. Otherwise, despite positive assessments by global institutions and pretty economic data, not all will feel satisfied with the nation’s economic and industrial development.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS