In a four-year campaign to root out risks to China’s financial system, regulators have set upon their biggest target yet: the world’s largest financial technology sector.
All three financial watchdogs have made it their primary goal this year to curb the “reckless” push of technology firms into finance, taking aim at a sector where loose oversight fueled breakneck growth for companies such as Ant Group and Tencent Holdings’ Wechat Pay. They have the green light from Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who in November last year called on regulators to “dare to” master their supervisory role.
The coordinated onslaught guarantees a shake-up among the country’s more than 7,000 microlenders, but regulators have made it clear they intend to stretch well beyond, into every corner of Internet finance from payments to credit scoring, wealth management to partnerships with banks and more.
Illustration: Louise Ting
Fintech is the latest sector marked for an overhaul since 2017, when China’s leaders pledged to clean up threats to its US$53 trillion financial industry, tackling property loans, opaque wealth management products and fraud-riddled peer-to-peer (P2P) lending.
“Everything points to a toughening regulatory stance, which will surely bring more curbs down the road,” said Zhang Xiaoxi (張曉曦), a Beijing-based analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics. “Chinese regulators wouldn’t be comfortable with any financial activities staying outside their purview.”
No punches were pulled in November last year when authorities squashed the initial public offering of billionaire Jack Ma’s (馬雲) Ant, stunning investors from Shanghai to New York.
The world’s most valuable fintech has become a symbol of the no-holds-barred campaign under way, with Ant executives considering a plan that would make the firm more like a bank, subject to tighter oversight and higher capital requirements.
Authorities have told Ant it needs to get closer to its roots as a provider of payment services, while putting online transactions under oversight.
China’s central bank last week warned that any firm with more than 50 percent of the market in online payments or any two with more than two-thirds could face antitrust probes, and in a worst-case scenario be broken up.
Ant’s Alipay and Wechat Pay are the biggest players in mobile payments, although the regulator has yet to clarify how it will judge market share.
Years of a head-to-head rivalry between Ant and Tencent dented profitability of the businesses, and transaction growth has fallen to less than 10 percent, from more than 60 percent two years ago. Still, the data and user stickiness from payments has enabled the firms to diversify into other financial segments, which are being put under supervision one after another.
Analysts at Citigroup predict new rules could include a cap on how much financial groups can partner with online lending platforms, and funding and capital requirements.
Chen Shujin (陳姝瑾), an analyst at Jefferies Financial Group, said that regulators could also further crack down on their distribution of mutual funds and other wealth management products, standardize calculations on interest rates and force data sharing with the central bank’s credit-scoring system.
The People’s Bank of China this month said that it needs to move fast to fill the gaps in oversight, including banning overhyped marketing of financial products online and encouragement of excessive borrowing.
Guo Wuping (郭武平), head of consumer protection at the banking regulator, has said that easy access to online credit led many low-income and young people to be mired in debt.
Concerns about surging consumer debt have long unnerved authorities seeking to sustain the nation’s economic rise. Over the past decade, the speed with which Chinese households accumulated leverage surpassed every other major economy, according to the IMF.
Consumer loans climbed to a record 49 trillion yuan (US$7.62 trillion) in November last year, stoked by a housing boom and ready access to credit, but the official data does not capture all the risk, as loans offered on fintech platforms are mostly uncounted.
Ant has been at the forefront of the boom, providing small, unsecured loans to about 500 million people. Out of the about 1.7 trillion yuan in consumer loans it has underwritten, only about 2 percent were kept on its balance sheet with the rest funded by third parties or packaged as securities and sold on.
Its success spurred a crowd of imitators both large and small.
Rival units of Tencent, JD.com, Baidu and nearly 7,200 other microloan operations are scattered across China, nearly twice the 4,000 traditional banks and even surpassing the number of peer-to-peer lending platforms at the peak.
If what happened to the peer-to-peer lending industry is an indicator, the future for the vast majority of those fintech firms is bleak. In just two years, China purged the entire industry, which in its heyday had upwards of US$150 billion in loans outstanding and more than 50 million users.
Once hailed as an innovative way to match yield-chasing savers with cash-strapped borrowers, peer-to-peer lenders proliferated, helping fund everything from honeymoons and property purchase to companies’ working capital. Frauds and defaults became rampant, in some case leading to suicide and street protests.
Ma, who never dabbled in peer-to-peer lending, attempted to draw a line between the sector and his empire during a speech at the Bund Summit in Shanghai in October last year.
“We can’t dismiss Internet technology’s contribution to financial innovation simply because of what happened to P2Ps,” he said.
Once the sector came in for special scrutiny, even the biggest players such as Lufax and Dianrong.com were not spared, with the banking regulator saying in November last year that none of the platforms had survived the clampdown.
Officials have had a more measured approach to choking off shadow banking — often loans masquerading as investment products. A lifeline for many small enterprises and property developers shunned by traditional lenders, the sector swelled to US$10 trillion at its peak, driving up leverage and interconnectedness across the economy.
A subsequent crackdown shrank assets managed by a hodgepodge of institutions from banks to insurers and trusts by US$1 trillion from 2017 to 2019, forcing a record surge in bad loans. The government eased some curbs last year to stabilize the economy after the COVID-19 pandemic struck, halting its contraction.
Seen as necessary to ensuring financial and social stability in the world’s second-largest economy, the latest regulatory charge is not without risks. Easy access to credit has helped fuel consumer spending, boosting the economy and building wealth.
The sweep against fintech firms also comes as officials are trying to make the economy more self-sustaining, and they would need consumption and business investing to pull off the shift.
For now, financial stability remains the overarching concern.
“Fintech has not changed the nature of finance as a risky industry,” People’s Bank of China Deputy Governor Pan Gongsheng (潘功勝) said in an op-ed in the Financial Times on Wednesday. “China is trying to strike a balance between encouraging fintech development and preventing financial risks via prudent regulation.”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS