Somebody recently posted a proposal on the government’s Public Policy Network Participation Platform suggesting that classes for junior and senior-high school students should start at 9:30am.
The proposal passed the threshold for consideration by the government.
The person behind the proposal felt that students are asked to go to school too early in the morning — at 7:30am in most cases — and that this meant they were getting insufficient sleep. The result is that students nod off during class.
LEARNING EFFICIENCY
Starting the school day later in the morning, then, would significantly increase their learning efficiency.
The Ministry of Education responded by saying that this issue falls under the purview of local governments, but that it would look into it and give a response within two months.
For students to arrive before 7:30am, they need to leave home very early, unless they live close to school. If the journey takes half an hour, they need to start out at 7am, which means they would have to get out of bed by 6:30am at the latest.
If they want to get eight hours of sleep, they must be in bed by 10:30pm. Unfortunately, this is easier said than done, because before they turn in for the night, they are expected to do their homework, finish reading assignments and prepare for the next day’s tests.
Students finishing junior-high school or beginning senior-high school often study well into the night, and end up seriously sleep deprived. Over the days, year after year, this is certain to have an impact on their development.
There is no way of telling yet what the ministry’s decision would be, but if it does leave the decision to local governments, it could be a starting point for diversity in education.
IMPROVING EDUCATION
Indeed, the School-Based Curriculum and the School-Based Professional Development programs initiated with amendments to the General Guidelines of the Grade 1-9 Curriculum of Elementary and Junior-High School Education (國民教育九年一貫課程總綱) have made it easier to improve education at schools.
The situations and experiences of students vary widely, depending on where they attend school, be it in high-altitude areas or along the coasts. How great it would be for them to study subjects relevant to what happens in their lives.
For example, National Sun Yat-sen University repurposed an abandoned navy dormitory into a base for teaching staff and students about traditional Cijin sampan boats, an initiative that not only preserved a traditional craft, but also enabled them to develop a new style of boat by making models of the originals, an experience with significant educational value.
Taiwan is not a large country, and yet the climate in the north differs from that in the south, and lifestyles vary even more, depending on whether one lives in an urban or rural area.
AUTONOMY
This proposal, questioning our approach to teaching hours at the nation’s schools, can serve as a touchstone for how Taiwanese democracy is manifested, and how education is done.
It is not just local governments that should have some degree of autonomy in this, either — different approaches could be taken at the level of individual schools, too.
This would give students and their parents the ability to make their own choices and to be involved in the decisionmaking process.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS