Two recent developments relating to the reform of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could have far-reaching implications, not just for Taiwan, but the entire world.
First, on Friday last week, revisions to China’s National Defense Law came into effect that increase the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) hold over the military.
The amendments, ratified by the National People’s Congress on Dec. 26 last year, effectively neuter the role of China’s State Council — the country’s chief administrative authority — in formulating military policy, and places decisionmaking powers under the sole purview of the Central Military Commission (CMC), which is chaired by “paramount leader” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The move is the latest in a long list of power-grabs by Xi since he became CCP general secretary and commission chairman in 2012, and president the following year.
China’s unique political structure is characterized by multiple layers of competing and overlapping governance. Powerful provincial-level administrations are subordinate to a vast bureaucracy of the central government, which is itself subordinate to the CCP.
Positioned at the apex of China’s political pyramid, the party operates a plethora of “leading groups,” “steering groups” and commissions that exert influence over central government departments. To avoid a repeat of the Cultural Revolution, the CCP leadership after the death of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) handed over responsibilities to the central government in a bid to create a separation of powers.
However, this trend has now been comprehensively reversed by Xi. The State Council sits within the central government and is overseen by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), who should act as a counterbalance to Xi, but by divesting the State Council of its executive powers over defense, Xi has carried out another coup: He now possesses absolute authority over the PLA and China’s national defense policy, and has demolished the remaining checks and balances.
Speaking to Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, Zeng Zhiping, a military law expert at Soochow University in Suzhou, China, and a retired PLA lieutenant colonel, said that the State Council is now simply a rubber-stamp agency with regards to the formulation of defense policy.
This is a worrisome development. With so much power now centered on one individual, this significantly increases the potential for miscalculation and poor decisionmaking by the leader of the world’s largest military force.
The second concerning amendment to the law is the addition of “threats” or “disruption” to China’s “development interests” as a justification for a national partial mobilization and deployment of PLA troops and reserve forces.
Deng Yuwen (鄧聿文), a former deputy editor of the CCP in-house publication Study Times said: “It’s not surprising for Beijing to enhance the leadership of the CMC when the PLA is going out to defend China’s national interests across the world.”
By inserting the phrase “development interests,” Xi has established a legal basis for each branch of the PLA — land, sea, air, space and cyberwarfare — to project power around the globe to secure China’s extensive “One Belt, One Road” strategic investments that stretch across continents.
The move reveals his ambition to create an updated version of the UK’s Royal Navy-backed East India Company for the 21 century — “imperialism with Chinese characteristics.”
In his first order to the PLA as China’s supreme commander, Xi on Monday emphasized the need for “full-time combat readiness” and said that China’s military must be ready to “act at any second.”
Governments around the world should take note.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant