Less than 10 days after enjoying a solo concert by Taiwan-born pianist Chen Ruei-bin (陳瑞斌), I was saddened to learn that China’s foremost pianist, Fou Tsong (傅聰), who at the end of the 1950s went into exile in the UK, had succumbed to COVID-19. These extremes of emotion served up by the pandemic — joy and heartache — conjure up memories.
Fou’s father, Fu Lei (傅雷), was a well-known translator of French literature. When I returned to China in 1955, Fu was living in Shanghai and had already achieved distinction. Two years later, at age 19, I was lucky enough to escape the horrors of the Anti-Rightist Movement. Fu was less fortunate and in 1958 was branded a “rightist.”
Fu translated French writer Romain Rolland’s 10-novel sequence Jean-Christophe, which became an influential work among young students.
I did not read his translation at the time, but many people were denouncing rightist students, and claiming that Fu’s translation was indoctrinating them with ideas of “individual struggle,” turning them against the party.
As a result, I was not surprised when Fu was labeled a rightist. Soon after I learned that his son, then aged 24, had left Poland, where he was studying, and sought asylum in Britain.
Fu and his wife, Zhu Meifu (朱梅馥), were publicly denounced in “struggle sessions” during the Cultural Revolution, and committed suicide by hanging. Not long after, the prominent Shanghai-based pianist Gu Shengying (顧聖嬰) also took her life, aged 29 — the same age as I was then.
If Fou had returned to China, he would have suffered a similar fate. His decision to go into exile was based on his knowledge of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but it was also influenced by his upbringing. Since exile meant severing family ties and also that they could be harmed, there must have been a tacit agreement between him and his parents that they would sacrifice themselves to protect him.
The agreement might have been struck in 1956, when Fou returned to spend the holidays with his parents. The campaign to eliminate counterrevolutionaries had just ended and the Hu Feng Group (胡風集團) of artistic and literary intellectuals opposed to the revolution had been brutally purged.
Fou escaped the purges, only to be killed decades later by the “CCP virus.” Thus two generations of the gifted Fu family were unable to evade the evil clutches of the CCP.
During the pandemic, Taiwan has been able to hold concerts and people are able to go about their lives, all thanks to the nation’s excellent epidemic prevention efforts. The government’s Central Epidemic Command Center, which has had to contend with repeated attacks from CCP proxies, consistently reinforces the message that every step it takes is based on expert opinion.
This expertise is not only a matter of medical know-how, it is also a matter of its anti-CCP experience. Without that, the government would have been led astray, and the advice of the experts would have been distorted.
In other words, the government has always been skeptical of the information and advice coming from the CCP and the WHO. By comparison, Western countries, lacking in Taiwan’s anti-CCP and anti-communist defenses, have experienced a catastrophe.
The CCP’s philosophy is that it must use every weapon within its arsenal, and every disaster has the potential to be turned into a favorable situation. They call it “two-point theory.”
The CCP did not engage in passive epidemic prevention, but instead allowed the virus to spread abroad, turning it into a biological weapon, and thus a “good thing.”
Over the years, Taiwan has in effect been in a state of war, maintaining constant vigilance against the CCP, even sacrificing an element of its liberties. By contrast, Western nations have become drunk on notions of absolute freedom and liberty, and have become self-indulgent. This is why they are struggling to get a handle on the situation.
This is the lesson to be learned from the countless lives that have been lost during this pandemic, but the question is whether Western nations will strengthen their defenses against the CCP.
Western governments must understand that the CCP can never, ever be trusted: They are professional liars and there is evil intent in everything they do.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel appears not to have received the memo, as the EU has just inked a new investment deal with Beijing. The question now is whether US president-elect Joe Biden understands the nature of the threat.
In 1997, because I did not trust the CCP, I left Hong Kong for the US. The primary reason I moved to Taiwan in 2006 was over my disappointment with the overseas Chinese pro-democracy movement and a feeling that the US lacked anti-CCP and anti-communist defenses. Everything that has happened since has proved that my decision was correct.
Nations that robustly defend against and oppose the CCP will thrive and prosper; those that do not will perish.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS