US president-elect Joe Biden’s victory initially raised concerns among Taiwanese banking on a continuation of US President Donald Trump’s pro-Taiwan policies and willingness to take the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to task.
Consistency between US administrations is crucial for stability in many areas, not least across the Taiwan Strait. Remarks by former US assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs Kurt Campbell via videoconference at the Taiwan-US-Japan Trilateral Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue forum in Taipei on Tuesday addressed this.
Campbell said that Biden would reach across the aisle at home, although there is no lack of consensus on the need for a pushback against the CCP, and would be aware the world is different from when he was former US president Barack Obama’s vice president.
Awareness of Taiwan’s strategic importance is more developed now than 25 years ago, because of the academic and strategic interest in, and a shift in the center of US foreign policy from the Middle East to Asia, Campbell said.
He also offered assurances that the US would stand by its promises to protect Taiwan, and said that he believed Biden would build upon the good work of the Trump administration in terms of bolstering exchanges with Taiwan.
If US policy on Taiwan has lacked consistency in the past, it is because of uncertainty over the CCP’s intentions and how China would develop. Would the CCP accede to pressure to democratize? Would it become a reliable member of the international community? Over the past decade it has become apparent that neither of these will happen.
Despite Trump’s oft-vaunted isolationist “America first” approach, the US has consistently been America first. As former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger once said: “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests.”
That does not mean that Trump does not see the value in coalitions. It was he who showed interest in resurrecting the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, the informal strategic forum between Australia, India, Japan and the US initially proposed by then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe and pursued under Trump’s direction by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as a forum well-placed to discuss how to curtail China’s more assertive proclivities.
Taiwan enjoyed considerable support from Abe. Fortunately, his successor, Yoshihide Suga, was Abe’s right-hand man, and there are signs that he will continue to be friendly with Taiwan. During Tuesday’s forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) referred to the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association naming next year “Japan-Taiwan Friendship Year.”
Taiwan has a different political culture to the US and, unlike Japan with its remarkably stable political climate, Taiwan has had frequent transitions of power between political parties with widely different agendas and worldviews.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) distanced himself from the US, preferring increased engagement with China. Since 2016, Tsai has moved in the opposite direction, with far closer alignment with the US and working toward more engagement in the Indo-Pacific region, in addition to desinicizing Taiwan’s culture. She has emphasized the relationship with Japan, and jumped at Czech politicians’ friendly overtures.
The KMT, which continues to show signs of antipathy toward the US and Japan — most recently with its robust protests and populist appeals against importing US pork and food from Japan that it claims is still contaminated with radiation — could swing that pendulum back if it returns to power, as it likely could.
The commitment to a joint security vision by Taiwan, Japan and the US, whether it be because of friendship, shared values or realpolitik, is strong. A KMT administration would be the weak link.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS