The COVID-19 crisis has presented Europe with a once-in-a-generation opportunity to launch a new era of economic growth. If the private sector and governments across the EU work together on bold, innovative policies in the near term, they can address not only this crisis, but also foster steady business investment and the creation of good jobs well into the future.
The EU is moving forward with 750 billion euros (US$897 billion) of new stimulus spending as part of its Next Generation EU initiative, more than one-third of which is earmarked for projects related to climate change, including research into low-carbon solutions.
As this funding makes its way into the real economy, it is likely to broaden understanding of how climate-related investments can positively affect communities and businesses.
To ensure maximum impact, Capgemini Invent recently released “Fit for Net-Zero,” a first-of-its-kind economic analysis of the investment opportunities on offer at present.
Commissioned by Breakthrough Energy, a network of climate-oriented entities and initiatives backed by Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates, the report identifies 55 low-carbon, real-world projects across Europe that are ripe for investment.
Each project is geared toward scaling up new technologies and business models that would help Europe achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and all sit within one of five crucial sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and agriculture.
Moreover, each project is at a different level of maturity, representing the full spectrum of the innovation cycle, from early-stage demonstration to late-stage deployment, which helps diversify risk.
Together, these projects have the potential to reinvigorate and transform Europe’s economy.
According to our report, developing and deploying these projects can create a 12.9 trillion euro market opportunity, support 12.7 million jobs and help the EU achieve its ambitious emissions-reduction goals by the middle of this century.
To have such an outsize effect, each project requires its own mix of private-sector creativity and capital investment, in addition to public funding and an appropriately aligned policy framework from the EU and its 27 member states.
What do these innovative projects look like, and what policies are needed to support them? Consider floating offshore wind. Europe’s nearshore shallow seas are already crowded with wind turbines, but until recently, it has been much too expensive to develop wind farms in the deep water where 80 percent of Europe’s offshore wind-generating potential is found.
By building 100 large-scale floating wind farms by 2030 in the Baltic and North seas, and in the Atlantic Ocean, this vast potential can begin to be unlocked, and renewable energy production in countries like Portugal, Sweden and Estonia can be rapidly scaled up.
On the policy front, programs such as Horizon Europe, the EU’s primary funding vehicle for research and innovation, can accelerate advances in blade design and ultimately drive down costs for turbines that do not need to be permanently fixed onto the seabed.
Another promising investment area is in “Agriculture 4.0.” In Europe’s agriculture sector, the rate of uptake of digital technologies lags behind what is happening in other major industries, owing to margin constraints on farm equipment and a relative lack of investment capacity.
If farmers, technology companies, universities and others work together to identify best practices for farming technologies — such as satellite imaging, robotics and blockchain — they could create a 10 billion euro market by 2050 that would also help drive down emissions.
By bringing agriculture fully into the digital age, the sector can be made more appealing for a younger generation of farmers who want to maximize efficiencies in how fruit and vegetables are grown, livestock is raised, and arable land and forests are managed.
Finally, there are many opportunities in the renovation of public buildings. Schools, hospitals and other public facilities are vital to any community, but in Europe, they tend to be among the oldest and least energy-efficient forms of infrastructure. All told, buildings in Europe account for 40 percent of EU energy consumption.
Aided by new digital-modeling techniques, renovating public buildings across Europe with cutting-edge materials such as aerogel insulation and vacuum-glazed windows, which improve insulation while increasing penetration of natural light, could slash carbon dioxide emissions, reduce public energy costs and support 660,000 local jobs.
Policy measures to help increase EU-wide renovation rates to at least 3 percent annually include the just-announced Renovation Wave, investments in workforce development and measures to decarbonize the construction industry’s value chains.
Even with all their potential, these three investment areas barely scratch the surface of what is possible in Europe. Other projects include giga-factories to manufacture lithium-ion batteries, new forms of urban mobility such as shared autonomous vehicles, insect proteins to lower livestock emissions and “green hydrogen” to cut emissions at Europe’s roughly 500 steel plants.
Achieving a low-carbon future demands innovation. Identifying these projects now lays down the latest marker on Europe’s path to net-zero emissions by 2050, and to establishing the region as the global leader in the climate technology markets that the world could increasingly rely on.
As the EU recovery money allocated to fight climate change starts flowing into the economy, it must be ensured that political and industry leaders at all levels focus on commonsense, coordinated policymaking that promotes and adequately supports low-carbon research and innovation.
Developing and scaling up new technologies is hard. More to the point, it takes time, which is a resource that can no longer be spared.
Ann Mettler, senior director for Breakthrough Energy, was head of the European Political Strategy Centre, the in-house think tank of the European Commission. Cyril Garcia, chief executive of Capgemini Invent, is a member of the Capgemini Group executive board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers