Investment in providing electricity and clean cooking to hundreds of millions of people is “orders of magnitude” below what is needed to meet a global goal for everyone on the planet to use modern, green energy by 2030, researchers said on Thursday.
An estimated US$41 billion is required each year to supply electric power to all homes worldwide, but in 2018, only roughly a third of that, US$16 billion, was committed for this purpose in 20 key developing countries, an annual tracking report said.
Fossil fuels accounted for the largest share of electricity finance allocations — for the first time in at least six years.
Illustration: June Hsu
The trend was driven mainly by grid-connected coal and gas projects in Bangladesh, the researchers said, calling for an end to backing for carbon-heavy power plants.
Finance for clean cooking to replace harmful energy sources such as kerosene and charcoal in 2018 tripled to US$131 million — but is still just a fraction of the estimated annual US$4.5 billion needed for universal access by 2030, they said.
Donor governments and development banks provided less than half of financing for electrification, with the rest coming from private investors. For cooking, public money accounted for 60 percent.
“As we deal with the ongoing challenges of COVID-19, and the ever-growing impacts of climate change, the need for modern, sustainable energy access has never been more important,” Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL) chief executive officer Damilola Ogunbiyi said.
“Yet [the report] shows a chronic lack of investment in electricity and clean cooking for those that need it most,” said Ogunbiyi, who also cochairs UN-Energy.
In Chad, 88 percent of people have no access to electricity, but researchers did not find even US$1 of financing for power in the poor Central African country in 2018, said Olivia Coldrey, technical lead for energy finance of SEforALL, an international body that coproduced the research.
Today, an estimated 789 million people still live without affordable, reliable electricity sources, mainly in Africa and Asia, while about 2.8 billion use dirty cooking methods.
The report showed that financing for grid-connected renewable energy declined for the first time since 2013, while the share of investment in mini-grids and off-grid solutions — often solar — was less than 1.5 percent of the total for electricity in 2018.
SEforALL said that low investment in locally produced electricity was especially worrisome in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it is vital both for powering rural healthcare and to deliver planned vaccines, which must be kept at very cold temperatures.
In a statement, SEforALL said that the latest data suggested that “the world will be delayed by decades” in meeting its 2030 goal for universal access to sustainable energy sources.
Researchers said that the increased funding for fossil fuel projects — about 40 percent of it provided by China — contradicted global efforts to tackle climate change.
A move back to dirty energy in the push to boost economies slammed by the pandemic is a risk, the report said.
The researchers cited India, which — despite rapid progress toward universal electrification driven by an ambitious green energy policy — has started auctioning more than 40 state-owned coal mines in response to COVID-19.
“We must prevent these types of policy reversals if we are to realize a long-term, green, resilient and inclusive economic recovery after COVID-19,” the report added.
Barbara Buchner, global managing director of the Climate Policy Initiative, a think tank that partnered on the research, said that governments should put their stimulus spending into clean energy and end support for fossil fuels, including subsidies.
“What we really need ... is to build our economies forward in a more sustainable way,” she said.
Buchner called for policies to support small and medium-sized local companies selling home solar systems or clean-cooking stoves, as well as financial innovation to reduce the risks for larger private investors coming into these markets.
Renat Heuberger, chief executive of sustainability company South Pole — which produced a complementary report showing delays in paying out nearly 60 percent of funds committed for energy access from 2002 to 2018 — said that financing models were not well suited to realities on the ground.
Renewable energy deals in countries like Nigeria or India have been held up or failed because of weak institutions, unfavorable feed-in tariffs and insufficient knowledge among local banks more used to backing fossil fuel projects, Heuberger said.
Energy access specialists have also expressed concern about the negative impact of economic lockdowns and resulting recessions on off-grid power companies in Africa and Asia.
Data from trade association GOGLA show that sales of off-grid solar products fell sharply in the first half of this year, as the pandemic hit trade and incomes in developing nations.
However, the sector, which grew at an annual rate of 10 percent in the previous three years, last week got a boost when the Green Climate Fund approved a US$30 million investment to support off-grid energy firms during the pandemic.
Starting next year, the Energy Access Relief Facility aims to offer US$100 million in loans to help about 90 companies ride out the COVID-19 crisis.
Leslie Labruto, global head of energy at Acumen, a nonprofit organization that helped develop the fund, said that the impact of the pandemic, while severe, had seen customers continue to prioritize payments for solar energy services even though new sales stalled.
Relief loans could shore up companies to start growing again in 2021, once COVID-19 restrictions ease and sales pick up, Labruto said.
“I am hoping we can make up ground in 2021 and beyond [for] energy access to reach its full potential, which is to see rural thriving economies and power in every home,” she said.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS