US President Donald Trump enjoys widespread support in Taiwan, because it is difficult to imagine any other US president pressuring Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) as directly and effectively as Trump has.
For the same reason, Hong Kongers would also have liked Trump to stay in office for a second term.
What about Chinese? Interestingly, Chinese liberal intellectuals and the “red second generation” — the offspring of Chinese Communist Party leaders — are united in their support for Trump. The difference between them is that liberals are worried about Xi obstructing China’s path to democracy, whereas the “red second generation” resent Xi’s monopoly hold on power.
Will US president-elect Joe Biden withdraw from the “anti-China united front” after he takes office? Biden met Xi numerous times when he was vice president in former US president Barack Obama’s administration. Some media even described Biden and Xi’s relationship as cordial. In the run-up to the US presidential election, some media accused Biden’s son Hunter of having major collusions of interest with China. Trump blasted Biden, saying that China would “own” the US if Biden was elected.
In more political terms, might Biden turn out to be a second Neville Chamberlain by appeasing China, just as Chamberlain as British prime minister appeased Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini in the late 1930s?
What Biden will do is difficult to predict, because he will not start making meaningful moves until he gets into the White House.
However, something can be said about the conditions under which he will be working.
First, while nearly 79 million Americans voted for Biden, more than 73 million voted for Trump, so Trump’s continuing influence should not be underestimated.
Biden keeps saying that “unity” is his biggest priority. This shows that he would not and dares not start a process of reckless “de-Trumping,” which would needlessly offend the other half of the electorate. As well, the Republican Party still controls the US Senate, where it will not give Biden a free rein to do whatever he wants.
Second, there is a consensus between the Democratic and Republican parties with respect to resisting China.
Third, the US mainstream media went all-out to attack Trump and support Biden in the election, but biased as they might be, left-wing and right-wing media alike are united in their “anti-China” stance and their support for Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Fourth, the core values that the US upholds are also universal values and the US media are tireless in their pursuit of these values. Even if Biden turns out to be a Xi lover, he would still need to worry about the power of the media.
“Populism” is not a clearly defined concept. That is why US Deputy National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger, in a speech he gave in Chinese on Oct. 23, could use a different Chinese equivalent than usual for the English word “populism.”
According to a survey published by the Washington-based Pew Research Center on Oct. 6, negative views of China in nine out of 14 countries surveyed had reached the highest point since the center began conducting the survey more than a decade ago. In the US, negative views of China stand at 73 percent.
Fifth, no matter how China-friendly Biden might be, he must heed public opinion, which is his most important consideration.
Some people accuse President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her government of betting on Trump, but Tsai’s government is not in a position to bet on him.
One president in Taiwan who really could bet on US national elections was Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). In the 1948 US presidential election, Chiang bet on Republican candidate Thomas Dewey. Although Dewey lost the election, Chiang still had a big “China lobby” in the US.
The “China lobby” was backed by members of the US Senate and House of Representatives, media moguls, retired generals, business tycoons, religious figures and so on.
By contrast, Tsai’s administration cannot even afford an entry ticket to the racecourse, let alone bet on the horses. Trump’s foreign policies have been good for Taiwan.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus convener Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) had the most laughable idea about the US election. His reason for betting on Biden was that as soon as Biden got elected, the KMT would propose a referendum to cancel imports of US pork that might contain traces of the food additive ractopamine.
The problem with Lin’s idea is that marketing US pork is one of Biden’s top priorities. All the more so because hog and cattle farmers in the Midwest and southern states are voters whom Biden badly needs to get on his side.
Tsai and her government need to deal with the entire US government, not just Biden.
The KMT’s childish wishful thinking that Biden would be friendly to China and give the Democratic Progressive Party less room to maneuver politically is thoroughly illogical.
Who is afraid of Biden? The country that needs to worry about him is China, not Taiwan.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS