Roberta Pirazzini, a researcher at the Finnish Meteorological Institute, set out an arctic expedition to do something no one had ever tried before: Fly a drone near the North Pole.
Sensors on the drone would assess sunlight reflected from the ice. This measurement, known as surface albedo, is key to understanding how much solar radiation is absorbed by the Earth and how much is reflected back into the atmosphere. It is one of the scientific puzzles that can help predict how fast sea ice will melt.
Flying a drone over the planet’s northernmost reaches is no simple feat. Pirazzini and a fellow researcher at the institute, Henna-Reetta Hannula, spent months learning to fly. Technicians designed and built a sophisticated navigation system capable of handling extreme weather.
The scientists and their drones then joined the largest arctic expedition in history aboard the Polarstern, an icebreaker carrying dozens of researchers on a year-long mission. The pair had also brought along a smaller practice drone that could fly inside their tiny cabin, the only chance they would have to keep their skills sharp in the weeks of sailing before stepping onto the ice.
Right away, Pirazzini ran into the same problems that have beset arctic explorers for two centuries: treacherous navigation conditions and technology that buckles in the deep cold.
Drones and helicopters have trouble near the North Pole because satellite navigation is less exact at extreme northern latitudes. This creates mounting confusion the closer a pilot gets to the North Pole, and Pirazzini’s drones would be operating closer than any before.
The navigation nightmare claimed another drone earlier in the expedition. It took off from the ship, went in a completely uncontrolled direction and crashed. Pirazzini was terrified that her albedo-measuring drone might fall victim next, and her fears were confirmed as soon as she stepped onto the ice. The navigation system on the main drone was not working, meaning that she and Hannula would need to manually calculate distances, direction, altitude and wind speed.
“The freezing conditions were our main enemy, not only for the ice in the blade [of the drone’s rotors], but in our fingers,” Pirazzini said, her voice cracking over a satellite telephone during the Polarstern’s return voyage earlier this month.
“You need very delicate, small motions to operate the drone,” she said. “When your hand is freezing, you lose sensitivity, your fingers can’t control the features anymore.”
Fog would turn into ice around the drone’s blades. Strong wind gusts might ground the drone. Still, the two scientists managed to conduct 18 flights over three weeks. Their albedo measurements are now being analyzed as part of a multinational effort to understand how warming temperatures are affecting the arctic — a scientific race against climate change itself.
The Earth’s northern icecap is heating about three times faster than the rest of the planet, disrupting a fragile ecosystem. Arctic sea ice, which melts during the summer and freezes back in winter months, shrank to the second-lowest level on record in September, the month when ice cover is usually at its lowest. Only in 2012 was the arctic sea-ice cover smaller.
Anomalously warm conditions in the Siberian arctic, which suffered an unprecedented heatwave during the first half of the year, are making it harder for the ice cover to regenerate. The arctic sea-ice cover is at the lowest level for this time of the year since satellite monitoring began in 1979 — 37 percent below the historical average.
“By this time in 2012, the ice had started to regrow,” Copernicus Climate Change Service deputy director Samantha Burgess said. “It’s a little early to tell what implications this will have for the rest of the season, but there are likely to be impacts for the marine food web.”
In August, when Pirazzini’s drone flights started, sea ice in the arctic had dropped to the lowest level on record for that month. These alarmingly low ice levels made it possible for the Polarstern to reach the North Pole from the Fram Strait between Norway’s Svalbard and Greenland in just six days.
“There were areas of open water everywhere, it was very easy to go there,” Pirazzini said. “That’s not nice if you think about the future of the arctic. It’s a very fragile environment that will change without return.”
Measuring albedo becomes more important as the ice cover shrinks. The white surfaces of arctic ice reflect solar radiation back into the atmosphere, while the ocean’s blue surfaces absorb it.
However, not all ice is equally reflective, and scientists are trying to find out how much solar radiation is being absorbed by ice sitting below shallow melt waters that have been spreading as temperatures stay warmer.
While sea-ice area can be monitored by satellites, other measurements that are crucial to understanding the speed of melting can only be obtained closer to the ground. These more granular data are essential to determining other drivers of climate change, such as how heat transfers through ice, and into the atmosphere and water.
Traditionally, scientists have taken albedo readings with airplanes and helicopters. However, drones are cheaper, can fly under worse weather conditions and below low clouds. Pirazzini’s flights ranged between 5m and 30m above the ice.
“Drone technology is making progress every month, every year,” she said. “We are at the infancy of this business, and I believe it will expand very much because these are unique and needed measurements.”
In the arctic, operating drones far from other scientists sometimes involved risk. Pirazzini and Hannula had to cross a fracture in the ice using a pontoon as a raft. At one point, Pirazzini was kneeling on a raft over icy seawater, holding the carefully wrapped drone, while Hannula helped her moor to safety by using a long stick.
The drones at times proved more resilient to the rough arctic weather than some of the expedition’s other flying objects.
Two tethered balloons, nicknamed Beluga and Miss Piggy, would be sent to take cover from hard conditions in a tent.
“Sometimes Miss Piggy was misbehaving and flying too low,” Pirazzini said. “We would need to make sure the drone wasn’t in the area.”
The scientific arsenal on the Polarstern included a helicopter and many weather balloons equipped with a radio system that collected and transmitted data on temperature, humidity, and wind direction and speed. A total of 1,574 balloons were launched — eight per day over 12 months — and scientists often decorated them with names and birthday messages for their families.
Hundreds of researchers from 20 countries took turns on the Polarstern for the mission, dubbed Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate.
Led by Germany’s Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, it was the first expedition in modern history to spend a full winter close to the North Pole. The mission, which had a budget of more than 140 million euros (US$165 million), ended on Oct. 12 after 389 days at sea.
“Climate change will probably force the organization of more expeditions like this one because there will be an urge to do something, to understand the implications,” Pirazzini said. “This expedition has drawn new paths for research. I feel I have the responsibility to make the most out of it.”
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS