Since last month, academics and market watchers have been discussing whether Taiwan’s housing market is overheating — a stark contrast to the chilly situation in the first five months of the year when the market was subdued by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Housing transactions in the nation’s six major municipalities last month rose 36 percent year-on-year and 12 percent month-on-month to 24,356 units, continuing a stable recovery from the previous two months and reaching a five-year high thanks to low interest rates, ample market liquidity and the COVID-19 outbreak having been brought under control.
The housing price index compiled by Sinyi Realty Inc showed that the figures in Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Kaohsiung hit record highs in the April-to-June period, while those in Taichung reached the second-highest on record. Figures in Taipei and New Taipei City rebounded to their 2015 highs.
Cathay Real Estate Development Co’s latest survey also found that prices last quarter held resilient amid the COVID-19 pandemic and were moving close to their historical high five years ago.
Due to low interest rates and stronger market competition, some lenders have even offered loans to potential homebuyers of up to 90 percent of a property’s value, which only adds fuel to an already hot situation in the housing market.
Central bank Deputy Governor Chen Nan-kuang (陳南光) earlier this month in The Taiwan Banker magazine wrote that the government should adopt “macro-prudential” measures before the public’s expectations of a sharp rise in housing prices take hold. Chen also warned that the continuing rise in housing prices would not help economic recovery, but might lead to more serious misplacement of national resources.
Furthermore, National Taiwan University economics professors Wu Tsong-min (吳聰敏), Li Yi-ting (李怡庭) and Chen Shiu-sheng (陳旭昇) in a newspaper commentary on Oct. 4 called on the central bank to clearly define its criteria for determining whether the market has overheated — a move they said would help the public better understand the rationale behind adjustments in the bank’s selective credit controls and allow people to have more accurate expectations for the housing market.
Minutes from the central bank’s past three quarterly policymaking meetings indeed show that board members are divided over the issue of housing prices.
At a news conference following the central bank’s Sept. 17 quarterly board meeting, Governor Yang Chin-long (楊金龍) said that the housing market has overheated only in parts of the nation.
During a meeting of the legislature’s Finance Committee on Thursday last week, Yang again played down the risk and denied that the central bank plans to tighten credit controls to rein in rising prices.
However, housing transactions and prices have been increasing over the past few months, aided by Taiwanese companies returning from China, international technology giants stepping up investments in the nation and land purchases by local developers and life insurance companies, according to a report issued by the central bank on the day before Yang appeared before the committee.
As global central banks have embarked on aggressive monetary easing to revive economies hit by the pandemic, the liquidity-driven rally in Taiwan’s housing market is likely to continue for a while.
A booming property market is not entirely a bad thing for the economy. However, at a time when the real economy is being hammered by the pandemic, a continued rise in housing prices could lead to many problems — such as financial instability, a widening wealth gap, housing injustice and resource misplacement — which could not be addressed by a single ministry or government agency.
The central bank cannot resolve these problems alone and it requires the coordinated efforts of various ministries and government agencies.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS