The ongoing, frequent encirclement of Taiwan by Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft and ships has turned up the heat in the Taiwan Strait. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has embarked on several inspection tours of the military, delivering speeches to boost the confidence of frontline soldiers. As an additional measure, she has significantly increased the number of generals to further lift morale.
On every front, increased confrontation with China has created a febrile atmosphere, which shows no signs of cooling down any time soon.
At the end of last month, a video posted online revealed that an unconfirmed number of PLA Air Force J-20 stealth fighters have been covertly stationed in Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, where they have been carrying out exercises. The forward base’s proximity to Taiwan — about 500km — means that the J-20s can easily reach Taiwanese airspace in about 20 minutes.
Since conventional radar is limited in its ability to detect stealth aircraft, to prepare for a conflict with China, the military must develop tactics to deal with the increased threat posed by the J-20s.
With PLA aircraft frequently crossing the median line of the Taiwan Strait in the past few months, Taiwan has no body of international law to fall back on, and until this year relied on nothing more than a tacit agreement with China to respect the line.
China has upended the “status quo” in the skies above Taiwan, which are no longer stable or safe.
To respond to the threat, the air force must rapidly increase its overall fighting strength and re-examine its tactical deployments.
China has adopted a new military strategy for Taiwan: Each time the US military squeezes the PLA in some way, China simply transfers that pressure onto the Taiwan Strait by ignoring Taiwan’s air defense identification zone and the median line, normalizing the transformation of the Strait into a PLA training ground.
Furthermore, by making the median line exist in name only, the PLA would be able to gradually encroach further toward Taiwan’s coastline and, in doing so, squeeze Taiwan’s 12 nautical mile (22.2km) territorial waters and airspace like a boa constrictor. This is Beijing’s modus operandi in its psychological warfare campaign against Taiwan.
China threw down the gauntlet of a “military unification” of Taiwan decades earlier and holds annual, large-scale military exercises in the Taiwan Strait. Beijing deliberately concocts and then “leaks” details relating to the exercises, which are used to manipulate the political narrative on Taiwan and re-enforce China’s political stance on the nation.
Beijing also uses domestic and international media to send signals threatening of military unification and increased hostility. Taiwanese must be cautious in the way they respond to such manipulated reports.
If the military could reorganize to bring itself to a heightened state of readiness, it would be able to make the most of its air defense capabilities and achieve a more effective outcome against China.
However, from a strictly professional perspective, since its inception, the general direction of the military’s war preparations, its thinking on command structures and troop utilization, its logistics and replenishment capabilities, and its overall preparedness for war do not provide much cause for optimism.
A significant number of European and US military experts agree that the Taiwan Strait is the No. 1 hot spot for a military conflict. For this reason, Taiwan must show the world that it possesses the will to resist China and ability to defend itself against an attack.
It must build asymmetric warfare capabilities, strengthen its guided-missile defenses, and, while working within the constraints of the national defense budget, reconstitute its air and naval armed strength, strive for military superiority in the Taiwan Strait and augment its defense capabilities to achieve an effective deterrence by increasing the cost for China of attacking Taiwan.
If politicians in Beijing believe that the PLA would be unable to win a quick and decisive victory against Taiwan and that the military option presents too great a risk, caught between a rock and a hard place, they would likely abandon their plan to take Taiwan by force.
Faced with China’s threats, the military has too many areas in need of reform. It must quickly get the ball rolling or face being unable to deploy its assets in time to meet the enemy’s increasingly brazen maneuvers.
If this happens, having ceded ground, the military would be left with only hollow words to mollify a dismayed public and would have handed the enemy carte blanche to gradually deepen its encroachment into Taiwan’s airspace.
Research shows that, due to the current heightened threat from China, the public is unwilling to strongly criticize the military so as not to affect morale — and they are even worried that to do so would expose Taiwan’s weakness to the enemy.
However, shielded by the protective umbrella of public goodwill, the military’s reforms, already carrying on at a snail’s pace, have even begun to go into reverse. The pursuit of personal interest is a serious problem and “administration according to the law” in the military is often little more than empty talk.
If the military carries on in this way, it will find it impossible to keep pace with the increasingly stringent structural demands required to defend Taiwan proper and Penghu.
As the tempestuous situation in the Taiwan Strait becomes increasingly dire, there are reports that the nation’s high-ranking generals are competing for power.
How can rank-and-file soldiers be expected to pull together and defeat the enemy when their commanding officers are busy squabbling and stabbing each other in the back?
As a Chinese saying goes: “When a ruler’s personal conduct is correct, his government is effective without giving orders. If his personal conduct is not correct, he might issue orders, but they will not be followed.”
High-ranking generals must show strict self-discipline and set a good example for the lower ranks. Generals are vying for power and profit while middle-ranking officers are exhausted and the lower ranks are left to clean up the mess. This damaging and unedifying state of affairs must not be allowed to continue.
Chang Yan-ting is a retired air force lieutenant general, university professor and researcher at US think tank the Stimson Center.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS