The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this.
Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed.
With the US and China locked in disputes on trade and technology, the administration of US President Donald Trump has sought international cooperation in shifting supply chains away from China since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while warning of the perils of relying solely on China. Washington has been stepping up those efforts ahead of the US presidential election in November.
The US delegation has expressed an interest in Taiwan’s semiconductor ecosystem, Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花) told a news conference on Sunday.
It is no surprise that TSMC would be at the center of industrial supply chain realignments, given its technological leadership and massive customer pool. The Hsinchu-based company supplies chips to US technology heavyweights including Apple Inc, 5G chipmaker Qualcomm Inc and graphics processor designer Nvidia Corp. Huawei Technologies Co was TSMC’s second-largest client before Washington placed the Chinese tech giant on its “entity list,” barring US and foreign companies from shipping chips to Huawei without a US government license. TSMC stopped shipping chips to Huawei when export restrictions took effect on Tuesday last week.
Cutting off TSMC’s chip supply to Huawei has proved an effective way to thwart China’s progress in building its own semiconductor supply chain. Huawei’s semiconductor subsidiary, HiSilicon Technologies Co, designs Kirin 5G chips used in Huawei’s 5G smartphones, competing with Qualcomm and Taiwan’s MediaTek Inc.
Without 5G chips made with TSMC’s 5-nanometer technology, Huawei is also losing its newly claimed dominance over the smartphone market. TSMC is the world’s only chipmaker capable of producing 5-nanometer chips, the most advanced available. As a result, Huawei has been forced to backtrack on its handset offerings.
TSMC is also to help job creation and semiconductor production in the US, after it in May announced that it planned to spend US$12 billion building an advanced plant in Arizona to make 5-nanometer chips by 2024, a move that analysts said was prompted by heightened geopolitical tensions between the world’s two largest economies.
The facility is to have an installed capacity of 20,000 semiconductor wafers per month, TSMC said. The investment would decrease the US’ economic dependence on China, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said.
Other Taiwanese manufacturers are also accelerating their movement of production out of China to avoid heavy US tariffs imposed on Chinese imports, which showcases their operational agility. Server and laptop maker Quanta Computer Inc is reportedly adding a third production line at its headquarters in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), while iPhone assemblers Pegatron Corp and Wistron Corp are turning to India to build new manufacturing sites.
The exodus of manufacturers from China has become an irresistible trend, and Taiwan stands to benefit from this shift if it plays its cards right.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS