At 3:30pm on Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sat down for a 90-minute interrogation in parliament, but there was one question he could not answer: Whether a top UK government law officer had quit.
Scotland’s advocate general Richard Keen had resigned because he could not reconcile his role as a lawyer with Johnson’s explosive plan to rewrite the Brexit deal and break international law.
The Internal Market Bill had already provoked storm at home and abroad that the prime minister — with all his charisma— his aides — with all their cunning — could not contain.
The prime minister and his team tried all day to persuade Keen to change his mind, and were still trying when Johnson arrived to give evidence to the British House of Commons Liaison Committee.
When he was asked if Keen was still in his post, Johnson was forced to admit he did not know.
“All I can tell you is that, as far as I know, conversations on that matter are still continuing,” he said.
Later that evening, Johnson was forced to concede defeat, and accept Keen was going. Despite his record of charming his way out of trouble, Johnson’s magic touch had found its limits.
It was an extraordinary glimpse into the chaos that has engulfed the British leader as a result of his proposal to renege on the exit treaty with the EU signed in January.
Adding to the sense of disarray, the whole row was a mistake rather than a deliberate negotiating tactic, according to one British official.
Many Conservatives already feared their leader was losing his grip even before the blunder over the bill.
Now Johnson’s strategy for a free-trade pact with the EU before the end of the year is in tatters.
trust at rock bottom
The two sides are miles apart, publicly trading blows and accusing each other of acting in bad faith. In private, European officials say trust in the British side is at rock bottom.
Brexit has had more than its fair share of turmoil over the past four years, and the British side is still confident this is just another temporary upset to the process of forging a new relationship with the continent.
Yet with six weeks left to resolve the impasse, and avert the threat of tariffs, quotas and upheaval at the UK border, even some in Johnson’s team are privately fearful of the damage the row has caused.
The furor was partly of the prime minister’s own making. The contentious element of the bill involves changes to the protocol for Northern Ireland, which shares a land border with the EU.
On Sept. 8, his team sent Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis into the House of Commons and told him to make clear that the legislation would break international law in a “specific and limited way.”
Lewis did his job and was then vilified by opponents and allies alike.
All five living former prime ministers raised grave concerns over the move.
On Friday, Amal Clooney added to the chorus of dismay by quitting her role as the UK’s special envoy on media freedom.
The EU was baffled at why the UK should take such a step, especially when the mood in the room during trade talks had been improving in recent weeks.
Officials in Brussels wasted no time in drawing up plans to take legal action against the UK for breaking the exit agreement treaty.
BLIGHTING UK’S FUTURE?
EU Head of Task Force for Relations with the UK Michel Barnier told European diplomats last week that the British moves showed bad faith and it was up to London to do something to rebuild trust.
The controversy also threatens to blight Britain’s future outside the bloc as a global free trading nation.
In Washington, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs Dominic Raab was on a mission to reassure worried politicians that Britain’s intentions toward Northern Ireland were honorable — and that the UK is still a trusted partner for a trade deal with the US.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he trusted Johnson’s team and was looking forward to a successful trade agreement.
Former US vice president Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, warned that any trade deal must be “contingent” on respect for the 1998 peace accord that largely ended three decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.
That raised alarms in London and prompted anger among some of Johnson’s Conservatives, some telling the Democrat not to “lecture” Britain.
NOT PREPARED
The truth is that a leak of the proposals contained in the bill forced the government to set out its plans publicly before it was ready, a British official said.
There was no chance to prepare the ground with the EU and explain the thinking before the starkest parts of the new law became public, the person said.
Mistake or not, the EU has demanded that Britain scrap the law by the end of the month, which Johnson will not do.
According to notes summarizing a meeting, Barnier told ambassadors from the 27 EU member states last week that the issue was a grave threat to the chances of a future trade deal.
“It will be difficult to agree on a new agreement when the previous one has not been respected,” Barnier is quoted as saying.
In London, Johnson faced another battle, this time with his own party.
Tory rebels aghast at the government’s plan to break international law were lining up to rewrite the bill.
A Cabinet minister was hinting he could quit if the prime minister pushed ahead.
All day long on Wednesday, Johnson’s team held talks with the rebels, chiefly former British deputy prime minister Damian Green.
Eventually, Downing Street officials cut a deal — to give the House of Commons a veto before ministers could in future break the terms of the Brexit deal.
There was a risk, though, that the compromise could anger the staunchly pro-Brexit wing of the party, and only when it was also signed up to the plan did Johnson’s office go ahead and announce it.
In Johnson’s team, there is still hope that a trade agreement will be reached with the EU before the Brexit transition period expires at the end of the year, even if the bloc does take the UK to court.
The two biggest issues that negotiators are haggling over — fishing and subsidy rules for businesses — can be resolved, one official said.
Britain expects to satisfy the EU with a political commitment not to adopt what Johnson has called “communist” policies of propping up failing companies at any price.
NO MORE TIME
The prime minister himself is also likely to need to intervene to rescue the talks in the weeks ahead, though Johnson’s team think it is still too early for such a gambit.
Yet time is running out. There is only one last round of formal negotiations due to take place, starting on Monday next week.
If there is no agreement by Oct. 15, the UK says it will be time to move on.
And the risk is that a political promise — even in Johnson’s own name — might not go far enough for a legally minded institution such as the EU.
In Barnier, Johnson is dealing with a technocrat rather than an elected politician. Charm may not work.
In any case, even the British side accepts that the EU’s willingness to trust the UK’s word may now not be what it was.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry