To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement.
First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy.
Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn.
Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the attention of the public and his critics. All this achieved was to further damage China’s credibility on the world stage.
If this were not bad enough, much of southwest and northeast China has since June been submerged under water due to catastrophic seasonal flooding.
China appears to be on the brink of collapse.
Faced with intense internal and external pressures, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might be expected to avoid generating fresh disputes. The last thing China needs right now is more chaos.
However, the CCP decided to stir up another hornet’s nest by tampering with the school curriculum in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
A new edict from Beijing requires that all classes taught at schools in the region, except for Mongolian-language classes, must be taught in Mandarin, not the mother tongue of Mongolians.
Unsurprisingly, Mongolians are up in arms over the CCP’s attack on their culture.
Looking from the outside in, the CCP’s actions appear foolhardy: Why are they bringing yet more trouble on themselves?
However, there is more to the CCP’s actions than meets the eye.
In March, the government of the Republic of Mongolia, which Beijing refers to as Outer Mongolia, passed a new national curriculum that requires its schools to teach all classes in traditional Mongolian script, also known as Hudum Mongol bichig, by 2025.
The Republic of Mongolia switched from traditional Mongolian script in 1946 after it gained independence from China, in favor of a Cyrillic script, also known as the Mongolian Cyrillic alphabet.
Official documentation between the Republic of Mongolia and Inner Mongolia is to this day still conducted using Middle Mongol, the language spoken during the 13th and 14th century Mongolian Empire. Middle Mongol remains an official written language recognized by China and the Republic of Mongolia.
In the past, when China’s economy was thriving and its national strength appeared unassailable, the Republic of Mongolia switching back to traditional Mongolian script would likely not have been a big issue for Beijing.
However, with China’s economy a mess and its national strength diminished, the Republic of Mongolia reverting to traditional Mongolian script would, on a cultural level, act as a powerful magnetic pull to Inner Mongolia residents who share a common culture and language.
This would be a nightmare scenario for Beijing. After all, throughout Chinese history, Mongolia has, either directly or indirectly, been the cause of collapse for all of China’s dynasties.
This might still be the case today, with China’s old adversary, Russia, acting as the Republic of Mongolia’s patron.
In 2018, Russia donated a large cache of military equipment to the Republic of Mongolia, as well as providing training for its military officers to help it fend off a Chinese threat.
If Inner Mongolia, under the cultural pull of the Republic of Mongolia, also returned to using traditional Mongolian script in 2025, a Crimea-type situation could occur, where Inner Mongolia would break away culturally from China and move closer to the long-held dream of Mongolians of reuniting their nation.
In such a scenario, a weakened China surrounded on all sides by a US-led alliance of nations, including Taiwan, would be powerless to prevent Inner Mongolia from returning to the Republic of Mongolia.
This is why Beijing has decided to strike first and gain the upper hand. It is destroying the native language of Mongolians in Inner Mongolia in an attempt to sever the cultural ties that bind them to their brethren.
John Yu is a civil servant
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with