The General Chamber of Commerce last week urged the government to expand relief funds available to companies affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and lower the threshold for qualification. The chamber’s call came just weeks after the annual white paper from the Taipei-based Chinese National Federation of Industries said that the government’s relief and stimulus measures were inadequate and could be better spent.
Although the Executive Yuan on July 23 approved a special relief package amounting to NT$210 billion (US$7.12 billion) in subsidies for firms hurt by the COVID-19 pandemic and funding for vaccines, its delay in two extraordinary legislative sessions this summer affected the ability of some government agencies to deliver promised subsidies.
The groups’ requests reflect worries that the relief funds are not reaching the companies that need it as border controls and quarantine requirements remain in place, as well as fears that the nation’s economy might need to brace for a tough fourth quarter amid softening demand for Taiwan’s exports, in light of escalating US-China trade tensions and a second global wave of COVID-19 infections coinciding with the peak of influenza season.
Consequently, apart from appealing for more funds, the groups called on the government to issue yet another round of stimulus vouchers, offer tax relief for small and medium-sized businesses, enhance access to corporate financing, and provide an exemption for the 5 percent tax on undistributed earnings as a supporting measure for businesses.
However, is there a need for additional relief? The COVID-19 situation in Taiwan is relatively under control and there was a boom in domestic tourism over the summer helped by the government’s Triple Stimulus Voucher program, which has helped domestic consumption return to normal and the economy gradually recover.
Fitch Ratings on Friday upgraded its forecast for the nation’s economy to annual growth of 1 percent for this year, compared with the 0.2 percent contraction it predicted in June and the government’s GDP growth forecast of 1.56 percent.
Asking for tax cuts is like adding fuel to the fire, further harming the nation’s fiscal situation: Relief programs are being launched as a temporary policy, but any tax cuts would mean long-term reductions in tax revenues and could seriously affect the nation’s fiscal profile. What is more, the corporate income tax must be paid only when a company makes money, so why should it be lowered now?
History has taught us that while cutting taxes is a politically popular move, raising taxes is not, which means that once taxes are cut, it would be hard to restore them to their previous levels, which is also a challenge for Taiwan’s fiscal health.
The previous and current governments have launched a spate of tax cuts since 2000, touting them as necessary moves to revive the economy. The truth is that lowering the land value incremental tax rate resulted in more real-estate speculation, the reduction in the inheritance and gift tax rate led businesspeople to repatriate funds into the property market rather than into real economic activity, and the dividend income tax cuts and the tax breaks for repatriated funds have not yielded the expected economic propulsion benefits.
Another tranche of stimulus vouchers would do little to boost the economy at this point, as private consumption has returned to normal. Despite uncertainties in terms of the global pandemic and the situation of major economies, the government should not rush to launch another voucher program or tax cuts.
As the nation’s finances have significantly deteriorated this year due to the economic downturn, lower tax revenues and higher expenditures, the government needs to avoid recklessly spending money in case the economy again encounters headwinds.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS