Ezekiel J. Emanuel’s Which Country Has the World’s Best Health Care?, a bestseller in the US published in June, includes a ranking of countries according to the quality of their healthcare services. Although Taiwan does not appear in the ranking, China does, and it is right at the bottom.
However, Emanuel mentions Taiwan, saying that its healthcare provision is different from that in advanced countries.
First, the healthcare environment is crowded, with the public placing high levels of demand on it, he says.
Second, relatives and friends are responsible for providing the patients’ basic daily needs, he says, adding that hospitals expect them to stay by the bedside, look after the inpatient’s daily needs, and perform tasks such as feeding, bathing or changing their drip.
This does not happen in advanced countries. I am pretty sure, that in those places, hospitals do not expect relatives and friends, who have had absolutely no medical training, to perform tasks normally left to the professionals. How can such a system be expected to provide sufficiently high levels of healthcare?
If you only look at specific cases, you would think that the standards of healthcare in Taiwan are extremely high. Think, for example, of the successful operation to separate conjoined twins Chang Chung-jen (張忠仁) and Chang Chung-i (張忠義), the National Health Insurance system or Taiwan’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which have received praise internationally.
Yet hospitals around the country are packed with relatives and friends, with a facility of 1,000 beds having twice that number of people staying there, making noise and denying patients a peaceful environment.
I was deputy head of the National Taiwan University Hospital Nursing Department for 10 years, and the head for another nine.
While I was there, patients and their families often complained of the noise levels, saying it would make it impossible to rest. Once, I had a relative complain that the nurses had not shown them how to dress a wound properly. The woman had seen that the gauze on the patient’s wound was bloody, and even though there were fresh wound dressing materials, medical tape and ointment, she dared not dress the wound herself. In fact, a nurse had shown a previous visitor how to do it, but not the woman in question, who had arrived later.
The nation’s hospitals should look at how things are done in advanced countries, where visitors are limited to designated times, and are there to accompany the inpatients, not perform medical work best left to the professionals.
If Taiwan wants its healthcare provision to be on par with that of more advanced societies, and avoid being an international laughing stock, hospitals should implement a comprehensive nursing system, and recruit adequately trained staff, to take care of all the patients’ needs.
Chou Chaw-fang is former head of the Nursing Department at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS