Ezekiel J. Emanuel’s Which Country Has the World’s Best Health Care?, a bestseller in the US published in June, includes a ranking of countries according to the quality of their healthcare services. Although Taiwan does not appear in the ranking, China does, and it is right at the bottom.
However, Emanuel mentions Taiwan, saying that its healthcare provision is different from that in advanced countries.
First, the healthcare environment is crowded, with the public placing high levels of demand on it, he says.
Second, relatives and friends are responsible for providing the patients’ basic daily needs, he says, adding that hospitals expect them to stay by the bedside, look after the inpatient’s daily needs, and perform tasks such as feeding, bathing or changing their drip.
This does not happen in advanced countries. I am pretty sure, that in those places, hospitals do not expect relatives and friends, who have had absolutely no medical training, to perform tasks normally left to the professionals. How can such a system be expected to provide sufficiently high levels of healthcare?
If you only look at specific cases, you would think that the standards of healthcare in Taiwan are extremely high. Think, for example, of the successful operation to separate conjoined twins Chang Chung-jen (張忠仁) and Chang Chung-i (張忠義), the National Health Insurance system or Taiwan’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which have received praise internationally.
Yet hospitals around the country are packed with relatives and friends, with a facility of 1,000 beds having twice that number of people staying there, making noise and denying patients a peaceful environment.
I was deputy head of the National Taiwan University Hospital Nursing Department for 10 years, and the head for another nine.
While I was there, patients and their families often complained of the noise levels, saying it would make it impossible to rest. Once, I had a relative complain that the nurses had not shown them how to dress a wound properly. The woman had seen that the gauze on the patient’s wound was bloody, and even though there were fresh wound dressing materials, medical tape and ointment, she dared not dress the wound herself. In fact, a nurse had shown a previous visitor how to do it, but not the woman in question, who had arrived later.
The nation’s hospitals should look at how things are done in advanced countries, where visitors are limited to designated times, and are there to accompany the inpatients, not perform medical work best left to the professionals.
If Taiwan wants its healthcare provision to be on par with that of more advanced societies, and avoid being an international laughing stock, hospitals should implement a comprehensive nursing system, and recruit adequately trained staff, to take care of all the patients’ needs.
Chou Chaw-fang is former head of the Nursing Department at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS