Six current and former legislators from three political parties, including former New Power Party chairman Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明), have been accused of taking bribes. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) did not mince her words about the scandal, as she warned Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) members who might yearn for power and wealth that they should leave the party.
The reason that lawmakers across party lines take bribes can be found in a fundamental problem with the political campaign system. Without thorough reform, it would keep happening.
The problem with campaigns is their huge cost. Take the six lawmakers for example: They spent between NT$30 million (US$1.02 million) and nearly NT$100 million on elections. The monthly salary of a Taiwanese lawmaker is about NT$200,000, very close to that of a Cabinet member. Together with various special subsidies, a lawmaker can make about NT$16 million during a four-year term. Even if the salaries of their assistants were counted in, it would still be difficult to cover their election expenses.
So what do they do? Following an unspoken rule, they hold public hearings, participate in question-and-answer sessions, co-sign draft bills and call meetings with officials, slowly turning legislation into a profit-making business through lobbying and putting pressure on the government. On a tacit understanding, no one says anything, while everyone is waiting to see who will be the first to get caught.
Are election expenses really that high? One should not be so naive as to believe the figures in the Central Election Commission’s (CEC) campaign expense bulletin. Even ignoring the question of whether candidates dare buy votes or whether voters sell their votes, advertising expenses alone are substantial.
One of the reasons Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) did not run for president was that someone on his team estimated that the campaign expenses would reach at least NT$2 billion, and that it would take NT$20 million to simply put up campaign flags in the 319 townships across the nation.
Former CEC chairman Huang Shih-cheng (黃石城) is fully aware of the impact that the huge election expenses are having on the nation. During his term in office, he repeatedly suggested that Taiwan learn from the British parliamentary elections, which limits a candidate’s election expenses to £500,000 (US$653,350). Taking into consideration the high average national income in the UK, perhaps the election expenses of Taiwanese candidates should be limited to half the British sum. That would allow able and virtuous people without much money to be elected.
When election expenses are too high, even more noble-minded lawmakers might fall into the bribery trap. That is because the legal definition of political donations is unclear and lawmakers are traditionally expected to lobby on behalf of their voters. The problem must be rooted out at the source to prevent it from happening again.
By saying that those who want power and money should leave the DPP, Tsai was trying to stop the party from bleeding dry. However, she should pay special attention to the fact that when a lawmaker takes a bribe, they ruin not only the party, but also the nation’s administrative, legislative, judicial and social moral values.
The DPP should take advantage of its legislative majority to push for expense limits on legislative, local and presidential elections to speed up the nation’s move toward democratic politics that all Taiwanese can be proud of.
Andrew Huang is a visiting professor at Aalto University in Finland.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.