Former minister of health and welfare Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) on Friday last week said that he had lost the last iota of respect he once had for Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) over the government’s banning Chinese children of Taiwanese-Chinese couples over the age of two from returning to Taiwan amid the COVID-19 pandemic unless they have Republic of China passports.
Yaung made the remark during a public hearing on allowing Chinese students and Chinese children of such couples to return to Taiwan.
His words were in the same vein as the accusations former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leveled at President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in February, when Ma said that the ban contravened the spirit of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Citing the convention, Yaung said that the right of a child to live with their parents must be protected regardless of nationality, religion or social status.
Ma’s initial criticism could be regarded as picking low-hanging fruit, as the issue of ensuring the welfare of vulnerable minors who are apparently beholden to the dictates of the state is an emotional one.
This does not mean that there is no validity to Ma or Yaung’s criticisms. However, deciding on who can enter the nation at this stage of the pandemic is a complex process, and requires a clearly defined policy to cover a wide range of individual circumstances.
The government has won plaudits for keeping the number of COVID-19 infections and deaths in the nation low.
However, this cannot lead to complacency. It is crucial to remember how tenuous the situation is.
One only need look at Melbourne, Australia’s second-largest city, where cases have spiked, following a lull in infections, during which time the federal government seemed to have won an impressive victory over the virus.
Singapore, too, was forced to reimpose its “circuit-breaker” lockdowns. It had gotten its initial outbreak under control, even before the WHO had declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic.
The Singaporean government attempted to control a subsequent outbreak among migrant workers living in densely populated dorms by implementing stringent limits to the workers’ freedom of movement, but the novel coronavirus still spread into the wider community, to devastating effect.
If the government takes its eyes off the ball even for a minute, or makes concessions to certain groups, however morally persuasive the argument for doing so may be, it risks a spike in infections, which might be difficult to get under control.
Numbers in this context are not mere metrics: They equate to lives.
When it comes to the issue of allowing the children of cross-strait marriages into Taiwan, the government seems to be “damned if it does, damned if it doesn’t.”
Whether one feels Tsai and Chen have made the right call depends on where one places the fulcrum between the rights of the group of children in question and the health of the public as a whole. People would only discern their error if it leads to a disaster.
However, Yaung’s reiteration of the rights of the child being unrelated to their nationality — as opposed to that of one parent — does ring true. The reason Chen gave on July 15 for making the age of two the cut-off point was that “there remains a large likelihood that the child will become Taiwanese,” as nationality can still be decided at that point.
These children do not decide whether they will adopt Taiwanese or Chinese nationality. This aspect of the policy seems like punishing the child for the decisions of their parents, based on arbitrary — and political — reasoning. The government should revisit that point.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
RSS