The Office of the US Trade Representative has since 2006 periodically published a blacklist of companies it calls “notorious markets,” which it deems responsible for large-scale intellectual property rights infringements. Last year’s list included online shopping platforms Taobao and Shopee.
Why are such companies allowed to operate in Taiwan?
Under Article 3 of the Measures Governing Investment Permit to the People of the Mainland Area (大陸地區人民來台投資許可辦法), a company incorporated in a third area, that is somewhere other than Taiwan or China, must still register as a “mainland-funded company” if Chinese investors hold more than 30 percent of its shares or have controlling power over the company.
According to the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Investment Commission, Shopee does not meet the definition of a “mainland-funded company.” Although Tencent is the biggest shareholder of Shopee’s Singaporean parent company, Sea Ltd — holding 39.7 percent of its shares — Tencent is not regarded as fully Chinese-funded, since Chinese investors only hold about 60 percent of its shares.
Chinese investment in the Singaporean company amounts to only 23.82 percent, which falls short of the threshold. Consequently, Shopee can operate in Taiwan without registering as a Chinese-funded company.
However, the commission’s definition of a “mainland-funded company” is problematic. In this example, although some of Tencent’s shares are owned by non-Chinese investors, Chinese investors undoubtedly have control over the conglomerate. Tencent should therefore be defined as 100 percent Chinese-controlled rather than 60 percent.
Since Tencent has an almost 40 percent stake in Shopee’s holding company, it would put the company over the threshold.
Second, even if Tencent is defined as just 60 percent “mainland-funded,” Sea’s other major shareholders deserve attention.
Although Sea’s founder, chairman and chief executive officer Forrest Li (李小冬), and chief operating officer Ye Gang (葉剛), hold Singaporean citizenship, they are originally from China. Li and Ye hold a total of 45 percent of Sea’s shares, so their ownership alone exceeds 30 percent, without taking Tencent into account.
No matter how the ownership is calculated, Sea is a Chinese-funded company that has its headquarters in Singapore. According to newspaper reports, some of Sea’s shareholders are Taiwanese. Maybe that is why it got waved through.
Taobao Taiwan’s entry into the Taiwanese market is another dubious case. The commission curiously allowed it to be set up by the Taipei branch office of Claddagh Venture Investment — a company incorporated in the UK with a stated initial capital of just US$1.
An even bigger concern is how Claddagh obtained the license to brand its Taiwan business as Taobao Taiwan. Considering that it even calls itself Taobao, how could it not be regarded as a Chinese-funded company?
The authorities need to look into whether the defining criteria of a Chinese-funded company are too lax.
The ministry’s initial decision to give Shopee the go-ahead was based on the so-called “30 percent” clause, but setting the defining criterion at 30 percent is obviously too lax.
The Legislative Yuan or the ministry should amend the regulations by cutting the 30 percent limit to 10 percent, or even 5 percent.
Liu Ming-te is an associate professor at a university.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo just dropped the other shoe in the White House’s multidimensional response to the hydra-headed existential challenge from communist China. Yet his sweeping address at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum on Thursday was the most powerful yet — a virtual declaration of a new cold war and a call for global delegitimization of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rule through what amounts to regime change. Although he did not explicitly mention either a cold war or regime change — terms that send shudders through the foreign policy establishment — Pompeo made it clear that
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties