With China jamming its national security legislation down Hong Kong’s throat, it is clear that Beijing’s commitment to honor the Sino-British Joint Declaration and Hong Kong’s Basic Law has ended. If China can turn its back on an agreement filed with the UN, can it be counted on to honor any of its international agreements?
With China’s influence perforated through international institutions such as the WHO, can the world still count on these organizations to perform their duties independently and without bias?
The slap-on-the-wrist response from the West is what makes China’s salami tactic viable.
Hong Kong’s dwindling freedoms since 2012 are evident. Freedom of speech has been curtailed with new red lines, and free press has been compromised by denying foreign journalists entry when they refuse to play along.
Meanwhile, Hong Kongers’ simple demand for universal suffrage has been stonewalled for more than three decades.
Orphaned by the West as one of Britain’s last colonies, all the West has done is express its concerns while Hong Kong languishes in this dysfunctional political system.
The Basic Law was drafted in the 1980s by Beijing’s handpicked proxies with a few token opposition figures, without the mandate of Hong Kongers. What does it say about China as a global power when it is unable to oblige by the rules it made itself?
The West’s nonchalance only reinforces Beijing’s cynical world view: might makes right. The West has also fallen victim to Beijing’s primitive doctrine.
Australia was smacked with punitive tariffs for its support of an independent investigation into the outbreak of COVID-19. Canada’s refusal to bend its independent judiciary to Beijing’s whims resulted in China taking Canadians hostage.
If these are not enough to show the detriments of having an undemocratic great power in the international community, the ever rising death tolls of COVID-19 should show how China’s censorship of each and every person can have lethal, global effects.
Hong Kong would be a good starting point for the world to address China’s unruly international behavior. The West entrusted Hong Kong to China in 1997 expectating that China would uphold its promise, making the West morally responsible for the fate of Hong Kong.
Unlike what happens in mainland China, developments in Hong Kong can still reach the rest of the world thanks to the valiant work of journalists. Hong Kong’s connection to the world makes it much more difficult for the Chinese Communist Party to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes.
Now that the foul play has been made apparent, the choice is either continual appeasement or to respond in strength.
Hong Kong should be the line in the sand unless the world is prepared to kiss goodbye to international norms and values.
Bernard W is a University of Toronto alumnus and a former policy researcher at a pro-Beijing think tank.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS