China’s Liaoning aircraft carrier group today began live-fire exercises in the Bohai Sea, which are to continue until Wednesday next week.
The sea’s similarity to conditions in the Taiwan Strait means that it is used by China’s military to test tactics and war-game an invasion of Taiwan.
It follows live-fire exercises in the South and East China seas by the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) 73rd and 74th groups, confirmed yesterday by Chinese state media. Both army groups, garrisoned in China’s Fujian and Guangdong provinces respectively, are believed to be tasked with preparing for an invasion of Taiwan.
While a potential Chinese invasion is understandably at the forefront of the minds of Taiwan’s politicians and military planners, an alternative, yet equally existential threat — a sea and air blockade of Taiwan proper — is given far less attention.
Events in the past few years suggest that it is time for the government to re-elevate the national security threat posed by a blockade.
The PLA in past decades has stepped up combined air and sea encirclement drills around Taiwan. While they are certainly intended as psychological warfare — the exercises usually stop abruptly around important elections — no mistake should be made, the exercises are also in preparation for a blockade.
In such a case, PLA Navy surface ships and submarines would ensure commercial shipping is unable to deliver vital supplies to Taiwan. In addition to enforcing a no-fly zone to protect its ships, China would probably also try to prevent a Berlin-style airlift operation from Japan.
After World War II, Allied forces mounted a round-the-clock operation to airlift food and supplies to West Berlin after Soviet forces imposed a blockade, which was an attempt to coerce Allied forces to abandon their half of the German capital.
The Ministry of National Defense on May 4 confirmed that China plans to set up an air defense identification zone in the South China Sea, which would require all civilian aircraft to identify themselves and announce their location. This follows the announcement of such a zone in the East China Sea in 2013.
Another warning sign came last month when Japan’s Kyodo news agency reported that the PLA is planning to hold a large-scale beach landing exercise in the South China Sea close to the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in August.
Capturing the islands would make it easier for China to enforce a blockade on Taiwan. While Beijing has sought to play down the report as merely “routine exercises,” Taipei is concerned and the military has moved to bolster its defense on the islands, as well as on nearby Itu Aba (Taiping Island, 太平島).
The US Department of Defense’s annual report to the US Congress last year said that the PLA has formulated plans for a “joint blockade campaign” that would allow China to slowly force Taiwan’s government into submission as the nation gradually ran out of food and other vital supplies.
A blockade would also be considerably easier for China’s military to execute than a full-scale invasion. It would carry far less political risk for Beijing, because if an invasion failed, the Chinese Communist Party would likely never recover.
A blockade could carry less international risk too: Would the US and other nations be willing to intervene in the event of a blockade? Foreign nations including the US might seek a diplomatic solution, rather than commit troops to break the blockade.
The government should consider elevating the threat posed by a blockade in its national security planning, and explore ways to increase the nation’s food, fuel and energy resiliency.
As Sun Tzu (孫子) wrote in The Art of War: “The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.”
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS