During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections.
Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world.
Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and democratization that finally overcame the initial reign of terror and subsquent dictatorial rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and attained a sophisticated democratic system affording human rights, free speech, free elections and a free press.
Today’s Taiwanese are a unique and proud people all their own.
All surveys find that they overwhelmingly identify as Taiwanese, not Chinese, and do not consider Taiwan by any measure to be a part of China.
Beijing’s “one country, two systems” rings just as hollow and unacceptable in Taiwan as it does in Hong Kong.
Taiwan’s national name, the Republic of China, which is based on a foreign Chinese constitution that never defined it as a legally applicable place to begin with, is totally out of touch with the realities Taiwan faces, is in conflict with and objected to by the People’s Republic of China, is unrecognizable in international society and should therefore be rectified to “Republic of Taiwan” through a national referendum process.
This would finally fulfill the 1945 UN Charter, whose provisions stipulate self-determination for once-colonized peoples, and achieve a resolution that Taiwanese deserve.
In return, Taiwan can and will be a great contributor to the world with its know-how, specialties and exceptional resources, which have largely been disregarded due to its Beijing-imposed isolation.
Universal recognition that China was the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, but chose to hide the outbreak’s proven consequences, highlights a glaring character flaw in the Communist government, while recognition that the WHO’s leadership was significantly influenced by Beijing, downplaying the severity of the virus, has resulted in a universal loss of the global health body’s credibility.
Had there been transparency and honesty, allowing for a prompt reaction to the severity of the coronavirus, millions of lives worldwide might have been saved.
It is a fact that Taiwan sent out an early warning to the world that there were signs of a serious viral epidemic in Wuhan, China.
Due to effective measures implemented by President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, Taiwan has limited the number of COVID-19 cases to 441 and seven deaths in a population of 23.5 million.
A similar achievement per capita in the US would have limited the number of deaths nationwide to 85, instead of more than 101,500.
The free world’s opinion of China has deteriorated to a point where the majority of those polled strongly disapprove of its attitude and its refusal to take responsibility for what has happened — two US states have filed charges against the Chinese government.
It is time for the nations of the free world to unite behind proposals to extend full and formal diplomatic recognition to Taiwan and inclusion in the WHO.
Frank Murkowski is a former US senator and former governor of Alaska.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing