In the movie Star Wars: Episode 3 — Revenge of the Sith, the Galactic Senate gathered to vote on the reorganization of the Galactic Republic into the Empire. Sith Lord Darth Sidious justified this change to “ensure the security and continuing stability” of the Republic. The Senators were elated. Princess Padme Amidala of the planet Naboo said: “This is how liberty dies ... with thunderous applause.”
A similar event might have occurred when the Chinese National People’s Congress gathered to vote on national security legislation for Hong Kong.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) would echo Darth Sidious, claiming that stability is China’s only way forward. His words would be met with the thunderous applause of 2,980 delegates from around China, but not a single directly elected representative from Hong Kong would have a say.
The freedom-loving world watches with dismay and horror as the orchestrated show of “democracy” in China reveals itself.
However, remember that none of this is surprising.
When Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997, the territory was the face of modern China and what all its major cities aspired to be. Forbes reported that in 1993 Hong Kong’s economy was valued at 27 percent of China’s, but by 2018 it was only 2.7 percent. Hong Kong has been eclipsed by China.
As of last year, Beijing’s economy was worth US$553 billion; Shanghai, US$540 billion; Shenzhen, US$374 billion; and Hong Kong, US$372 billion.
The numbers show that China has lost interest in Hong Kong. The territory has no long-term value for China since other cities can replicate and surpass its success.
A founder of the Republic of China, Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), said: “The Chinese do not know ‘liberty,’ but only about ‘getting rich.’”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), liberators of the oppressed and the guiding light of the Chinese, follow wherever the money takes them and no longer uphold the principles which the Chinese people once looked to them for.
The developments across the Taiwan Strait have only strengthened the national cause of Taiwanese to defend the freedoms and liberties which they now have.
Taiwan has become Asia’s bastion of democracy and much of the world recognizes this. The volume of congratulatory messages sent to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) after her inauguration for her second term is a testament to that.
Even the China-friendly Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recognizes the weight of this issue. KMT spokeswoman Hung Yu-chien (洪于茜) on May 22 said that “Taiwan, regardless of party, is concerned about the rights and situation of the people of Hong Kong.”
She also said that in bypassing the Hong Kong legislature, China not only breached the spirit of Hong Kong’s self-governance, but also the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984.
Perhaps now more than ever the KMT has the opportunity to return to their core principles and recognize that unification with China, on Beijing’s terms, would only mean the end of a democratic Taiwan.
The KMT must face reality and once again take a steadfast stance against the rising threat of Chinese communism.
Sun also said: “In a democracy it stands to reason that we should still show loyalty, not to princes, but to the nation and to the people.”
Loving a nation does not mean loving the government (or a political party), as the Chinese would say. Believing in democracy and the ability for all to have this right means standing side by side with the people of Hong Kong and Taiwan in the face of tyrannical injustice.
The two united fronts that were formed between the CCP and the KMT, first during the Northern Expedition against the warlords and again during World War II against the Japanese, are a hallmark of modern Chinese history that the Chinese people have the capacity to unite against common threats.
There is now a new impetus to bring together a new united front to defend liberty against Beijing and Xi’s “socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
The end of the Chinese National People’s Congress would be marked with thunderous applause and The Internationale, a song which has lost all its original meaning.
The lyrics of their own song are a rallying cry to rise against them: “This is the final struggle. Let us group together, and tomorrow the Internationale will be the human race.”
Nigel Li is a student at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s