While central banks have shown interest in developing their own digital currencies after Facebook last year scaled back its Libra cryptocurrency, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) in Beijing has begun trials of its own in four cities, news outlets reported last week, citing the bank’s Digital Currency Research Institute.
The Chinese-government backed digital currency has not been officially released, but the pilot trials in Shenzhen, Suzhou, Xiongan New Area and Chengdu have drawn attention because of how this currency would function. It has also raised eyebrows regarding how a digitalized yuan would affect Chinese banks and payment service providers, as well as the domestic economy and the global financial market.
In the past few years, China has repeatedly made high-profile claims about its intention to issue the world’s first central bank digital currency, hoping it would promote the yuan’s internationalization and provide its sovereign digital currency with the same status as the US dollar — or even greater.
However, it is anyone’s guess just how and when Beijing intends to do this, because only a few details about the currency have been disclosed since the establishment of the institute in 2014.
As Chinese already commonly use electronic payments through smartphones, why should Beijing pour so much effort to promote a digital currency? Now that the PBOC has confirmed what it calls “digital currency, electronic payment” (DCEP), the pilot program offers a rare peek into how traditional currency in digital form is issued and governed by a central bank.
The institute said that the digital currency has the same value of paper notes and coins in circulation, but as suggested by its name, it is to develop into an electronic payment instrument under the central bank’s control. In light of the increasing prevalence of people using electronic payment services through privately run WeChat Pay and Alipay, the new currency could pose an issue for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in terms of capital outflow, money laundering, gambling and terror financing.
China’s goal to launch DCEP ahead of its international peers could reflect its desire to manage the relevant challenges on its own terms, some pundits have said. Developing a government-backed digital currency is not only a technological issue, but a complicated mix of user identities, legal concerns, control over monetary policy and national sovereignty. The use of digital money could not only replace cash in the future, it could significantly affect economic activity and the financial system.
However, unlike decentralized blockchain technology cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin, that support anonymous transfers digital currencies developed by central banks remain supervised by those agencies and can be tracked electronically.
This has raised concerns: Would the CCP government monitor the behavior of people through the traceable characteristics of DCEP? Could such supervision eventually lead to controlling the behavior of people? Does the CCP intend to retain its long-term control of domestic politics and the economy through its DCEP?
There are no quick answers to those questions, but one certainty is that other central banks might move faster to launch their own currencies. It is a trend to use government-backed digital currencies as a substitute for or to complement bank notes to improve the efficiency of transactions or address the issue of safety in the financial system.
However, those currencies would also have economic, financial and even international political consequences, which deserve everyone’s close attention, including Taiwan’s central bank.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS