Firm, fair, rational quarantine
I arrived in Taiwan on March 11. On my seventh day in the country, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) contacted me and told me not to leave my accommodation. The authorities had changed their policy: All European arrivals from March 5 had to go into quarantine until they had been in the country for a period of 14 days.
The following morning, a woman from the CECC visited me at the apartment. She told me they were tracking my mobile phone to make sure I complied with the quarantine and gave me a thermometer. I had clear instructions to fill in a health sheet each day and contact them if I developed symptoms.
To protect my girlfriend, who I am living with, the woman gave me 14 masks — two for each day. I was rung each morning of the quarantine by both the CECC and the local police. At no point did I have any symptoms.
Some people would have judged this as being “over the top” or “draconian” a couple of weeks ago. However, take a look at the numbers: Cases in Taiwan increased by 152 during my quarantine period, with the vast majority developing symptoms while in isolation.
The UK, on the other hand, had nearly 7,000 new cases, and that is not including many who are undiagnosed.
As for my quarantine being “draconian,” well, this weekend my girlfriend and I went on a trip to Taroko National Park, and next weekend we are going to Taipei.
For now, the Taiwanese authorities have escalated their immigration and quarantine policy to stay a step ahead of the virus, and they continue to remain proactive, not reactive. History will judge them to have acted with appropriate force. Other countries should take note.
Should the general public wear face masks? The WHO says no, but perhaps it is time for a rethink.
The official line from the WHO is that face masks are vital for medical staff and people who are showing symptoms should also wear one.
However, in Taiwan, masks are ubiquitous — it would be rude to go out in public and not wear one. On my flight out here, for example, a woman asked me not to sit on her row because I did not have a mask.
While people in the UK were hoarding toilet rolls, Taiwanese were lining up for masks. Why?
After wearing a mask for two weeks, I now perceive the benefits. First, when I wear a mask, I rarely touch my face. And this is important in the age of corona. A 2015 study in Australia suggested we habitually touch our faces 23 times an hour. Reducing this number would undoubtedly decrease the infection rate.
Second, putting on the mask before I leave the house has become part of a ritual — as though I am preparing for battle. I take this attitude with me into public spaces and have a heightened awareness of hygiene. “What have I touched? When did I last wash my hands?” If you multiply this across a population, it will make a big difference.
My stepfather is a general practitioner in the UK and his practice has had to order protective equipment from Amazon. If the people in charge have underestimated the need for doctors to wear masks, then no doubt they have not appreciated their value in the public arena as well.
From being in Taiwan, it is clear the benefit of masks go beyond whether or not a virus can pass through a filtration membrane and into your lungs; they change behavior and instil a sense of collective responsibility.
Now, of course, the counter for many public health bodies is that there are not enough personal protective equipment for medical staff, so the public should not wear them. And I agree that it would have been irresponsible for many governments to have announced a mask-wearing policy at the beginning of last month.
However, this is a matter of preparedness. Any cost of stockpiling masks, or at least having the ability to increase production like Taiwan has done, would have been negligible compared with an economic downturn.
Respiratory viruses have always been a top public health threat, so it is not unreasonable to hope that my government in the UK would have been better prepared.
There will be a time when the countries under lockdown will have to ease their social distancing rules before a vaccine is available, and societies will have to find ways of adapting to a new, coronavirus reality.
I hope when that time comes, those in charge look at Taiwan and see a need to develop the capability to impose strict quarantine rules and consider a policy of face masks to be worn in public spaces. Taiwan is increasing production of masks and ready to export if they need a hand.
Nicholas Toomey
Taichung
Great opportunity for CPBL
The Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) has been presented with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity amid the COVID-19 pandemic. It should be broadcasting its games to the world, perhaps via YouTube, when they began on Saturday and get permission to fly in some top US, Japanese and other players to generate global interest.
With the games in empty stadiums, the league will need an alternative source of income and the likes of YouTube have built-in revenue-generating services that could be flooded by a planet’s worth of baseball-starved fans.
The CPBL should approach the government with a request for it to talk with other states about getting players tested and flown in for a few months.
Jarrod McCracken (pseudonym)
Taipei
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)