Although only three new cases of COVID-19 were reported yesterday — all of them imported — the domestic situation over the next two weeks is still worrisome, especially amid a lack of common sense demonstrated by people who flocked to the nation’s tourist hotspots during the four-day Tomb Sweeping Day holiday. This happened just days after the government announced social distancing guidelines and started implementing stricter measures regarding public transportation.
The government has done a stellar job so far of containing the virus, and Taiwan is one of the few places in the world where people are not locked down and suffering from cabin fever.
The nation’s accomplishments have repeatedly been lauded in the international media — even making it to CNN’s front page on Sunday — which boosts Taiwan’s international profile and should be celebrated.
However, all of this seems to have led to a false sense of security both on the government’s and the public’s part.
Although the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Taiwan remains relatively low, there has been a steady flow of domestic infections; and while there is no need to panic, such lack of fear amid a global crisis is alarming, as the virus rages on.
The government seems to have placed a great deal of trust in the public to follow the rules and has been reluctant to lay down the law like other countries have done.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said before the holiday that he was reluctant to tell people not to travel, adding that it is a good thing to go out and relax as long as people followed social distancing rules or wore masks.
He cited Taiwan’s low number of cluster infections and people who had returned from abroad being under self-quarantine as reasons for not ordering people to stay at home.
Chen added that domestic travel is still considered safe and that there was no need to be overly anxious.
The government does not want people to panic, but perhaps it could have changed its tone to reflect the severity of the situation, as some took its lax stance to heart and completely forgot that there is a pandemic.
Those who visited certain hotspots nationwide are being asked to monitor their health for 14 days. This includes informing their employers or schools of their travel history. However, local Chinese-language media have already reported about a couple allegedly lying to teachers at their child’s preschool about their travels during the holiday.
It is up to people to keep Taiwan the safe place it has been since the outbreak began — and not just those who traveled during the holiday; everyone should remain vigilant and practice social distancing.
Taiwanese still have the luxury to go outside and live their lives — those who think that disease prevention rules are cumbersome should think of the rest of the world under lockdown.
A total lockdown seems unlikely here, but the government’s tone is starting to change. Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) has hinted that the nation might restrict domestic travel for the next long weekend if people do not follow the rules over the next two weeks. Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) yesterday said that the government does not plan on canceling the May 1 long weekend “as long as people remain self-disciplined.”
Taiwanese need to remain vigilant and alert in the coming weeks, and be thankful for the freedom that they enjoy, instead of abusing it.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS