As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked.
The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport at short notice.
To prevent the flights being seen by outside observers as one nation evacuating its citizens from another nation, Beijing deliberately made them inconvenient for Taiwanese who wanted to return home — by having them travel to Shanghai to board a “normal” flight. With health authorities in Taiwan and around the world having advised people against taking long train rides, the move was made in total disregard of the risk to evacuees.
Since the first charter flight arranged by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Committee member Hsu Cheng-wen (徐正文), Beijing has become increasingly picky over the way in which flights involving Taiwanese should be operated, taking more than a month before allowing China Airlines and China Eastern Airlines to bring Taiwanese home on March 10 and March 11.
China is obviously subjecting Taiwan to more unfavorable terms, and if things continue in this direction, there is no telling what outlandish terms Beijing might come up with.
Lawmakers across party lines have asked Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) how upcoming flights would be carried out.
Su said the government had suffered “setbacks” during its evacuation talks with Chinese authorities, and that Beijing has given it “a lot of trouble by insisting on this and that.” The government refrained from “bargaining too much” with Beijing, as it hoped to bring more people home, Su said, declining to discuss details.
People now have a glimpse of what Beijing’s stipulations were. As expected, they were laughable and completely unnecessary, as with any of its past attempts to belittle the nation.
Beijing might have thought that by excluding Taiwan from its normal operations regarding the repatriation of foreigners, it could hide that Taiwanese were being evacuated from Hubei, just like the people of other nations were.
However, Taiwan’s international status has been unaffected by the move, and word about the evacuation has gotten out all the same. In a classic case of self-deception, Beijing’s handling of the flights fits perfectly with a Chinese folk tale about a thief who tried to steal a bell and believed that he could go unnoticed just by covering his ears.
As if causing a pandemic and triggering a global economic meltdown were not enough, China seemed compelled to cover up the two evacuation flights, insisting that it was in a position to negotiate.
Such willfulness has proven that China, as mighty and powerful as it so often professes to be, is an insecure, fascist nation that cannot maintain its composure during an outbreak.
More Taiwanese are in Hubei waiting to return home. China should grow up, get some sense and allow them to board a flight home from the nearest airport.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations