The COVID-19 outbreak continues to spread around the globe. While governments are striving to take effective prevention measures, Taiwan is being praised by foreign media for its quick reaction and effective prevention measures.
Taiwan has fever confirmed COVID-19 cases than neighboring countries, such as South Korea and Japan.
Countries facing a rapid increase of confirmed cases are suffering not only from public panic, but also from a shortage of masks.
However, Taiwan has shown outstanding leadership by urgently taking measures to address public fear and prevent people from stocking up masks.
Besides, Taiwan already blocked the entry of people from China before the circumstances were exacerbated, and cooperated with medical experts. The government was able to take action quickly, as the National Health Command Center (NHCC), which was established during the SARS outbreak, played a critical role in successfully handling COVID-19 related issues.
The government prohibited the export of masks just four days after identifying the first confirmed case and started to install additional mask production lines.
It implemented a mask rationing system and the state-owned Chunghwa Post has been delivering 3.96 million masks per day from 24 factories to 6,515 National Health Insurance (NHI)-contracted pharmacies across the country.
As Taiwan’s COVID-19 prevention measures are clearly taking effect, the world should refer to the following prevention measures taken by the government.
Taiwan started airport inspection of passengers coming from Wuhan, China, in the initial phase of the outbreak, from Hubei Province later in January and banned the entry of Chinese people from Feb. 7. Taiwanese passengers were placed under quarantine for 14 days.
It is a policy that might have a negative effect on cross-strait relations. However, the government made the decision to protect its citizens.
South Korea and Japan did not strictly control their borders in the initial stage, which is counted as one of the causes that increased the risk of COVID-19 spread.
In 2003, Taiwan suffered from the SARS outbreak. A year later, the government established the NHCC. Within the NHCC, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) is one of the branches that coordinates with various ministries to enact policies and strategies regarding COVID-19.
It is led by Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), a physician, scientist and expert on infectious disease, and political interference is ruled out. The experience of dealing with SARS and the well-developed infrastructure of the CECC enabled a quick response to initial reports of COVID-19.
Along with a ban on mask exports, the government requested mask production factories to work around the clock and provided financial support to install additional production lines.
Taiwan provided personnel by deploying the military to mask production factories to help alleviate the shortage problem. Soldiers are also guarding the factories to prevent any attempts to smuggle products.
As the government took control of mask production and imposed a mask rationing system, which allows people to purchase a limited number of masks only at pharmacies using their NHI cards, mask-hoarding or smuggling did not happen in Taiwan.
The government purchased all the masks that were produced in Taiwan and lowered the price of masks. The original price of one mask was NT$8, which was lowered to NT$5.
That was possible because Chunghwa Post is in charge of distributing masks from 24 factories in 10 cities and counties to post offices for delivery. About 3,000 postal workers deliver masks that are to be sold at more than 6,000 locations nationwide.
Minister Without Portfolio Audrey Tang (唐鳳), the government’s digital expert, has developed an online platform that contains more than 100 maps that provide real-time information about the availability of masks across Taiwan.
Starting on Thursday last week, people can also purchase masks online.
South Korea implemented a mask rationing system similar to Taiwan’s to prevent mask-hoarding.
However, it came only after the confirmed cases there increased exponentially and more than 100 countries banned flights from South Korea.
The South Korean government only banned flights from Hubei Province, and medical experts have strongly urged the government to ban all flights from China, which has not been accepted by the government.
However, as the number of confirmed cases is drastically increasing not only in Asia, but also in European countries and the US, it is becoming more clear that the world is under the influence of COVID-19.
It is high time that governments refrain from making decisions based on political calculation, every nation should prioritize citizens’ health and take preventive measures to fight against COVID-19. The world could learn from Taiwan’s COVID-19 prevention measures.
Taiwan can help.
Amber Kim is a student in National Chengchi University’s international master’s program in Asia-Pacific studies.
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)