National Taiwan Normal University president Wu Cheng-chih (吳正己) in an opinion piece published in the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Monday last week said that the tech sector might have taken all the computer teachers.
Wu said that teacher education is no longer popular, adding that there are now only two “pure” teacher education universities left in Taiwan, and that only 15 percent of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) graduates work as teachers.
Wu also said that the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines should teach students computational thinking, but that there is a shortage of teachers in the area of basic information studies, and not even 10 NTNU graduates per year want to teach computer studies.
Wu suggested that instructors in fields with an excess of teachers should receive a second specialty, as there is a need to integrate smaller schools in remote areas and they are addressing this problem by jointly hiring teachers and sharing them.
In response to the new political situation and new social demands, the Teacher Education Act (師資培育法) promulgated in February 1994 differs from the earlier Teacher Education Law (師範教育法) of 1978, according to which students were given teacher qualifications on graduation, together with the right and obligation to receive and accept a position as teacher.
The problem is that graduates with an information technology background are unwilling to work as teachers.
Young graduates cannot be blamed for not wanting to teach information technology in elementary schools and high schools, because doing so means having to first go through several levels of tests and evaluations.
Furthermore, the tests include written and oral tests, as well as live teaching trials.
In addition to being meticulous in their preparation, they must also familiarize themselves with the culture of public education and memorize the test questions, which many see as a perilous undertaking.
All this makes it difficult for young people with educational ideals to put those ideals into practice.
After going through numerous resumes, one business leader enamored with talented people realized that a young candidate who had announced his intent to show up for an interview never arrived.
The business leader called the job applicant and asked when he would be coming around for “some fun.” With just a few encouraging words, the young jobseeker’s worries faded away.
Could a similar scene play out in educational circles?
In addition, having a reserve of trained teachers should also be required.
For example, with the COVID-19 outbreak wreaking havoc in China, elementary schools and high schools have delayed returning to school, but cram schools are running as normal and students have to attend classes.
Some school presidents have expressed concern, but all they can do is to urge schools to take all the necessary prevention measures.
Another example is English-language classes in elementary schools: Many teachers agree that cram schools are more helpful to students’ English-language skills, because the language is only taught a couple of hours per week in elementary school, which is far from adequate.
Some students attend cram school, while others do not, and if there are not enough chances to study at school, the results are catastrophic.
If it were possible to move in tandem with what is happening in society and offer teacher training to cram school teachers, the overall quality of education could be raised.
Article 8-1 of the Teacher Education Act (師資培育法), which was amended last year, states: “In the light of policy requirements, and after the teacher education review committee has reviewed the matter and given approval, the central competent authority may coordinate the teacher education universities to organize pre-service teacher education courses and recruit university graduates who meet specific eligibility criteria to take those courses for at least one year.”
However, the phrase “university graduates who meet specific eligibility criteria” must be defined by the competent authority.
As Wu said, there is a severe shortage of information technology teachers, and perhaps graduate students with a background in information technology who still have not obtained teacher qualifications should be allowed to quickly go through a teacher training program. A shortage of English-language teachers could be handled in the same way.
To resolve the problem, civil servants must be given encouragement to demonstrate the courage required to innovate, and not be overly concerned about being charged with breaking the law while doing so.
Above all, the nation must not focus only on security: Only by increasing the nation’s teacher reserve in accordance with the law will it have access to a never-ending pool of teachers.
Chang Huey-por is a former president of National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS