At the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642, Warwick Castle was attacked by soldiers loyal to the king who tried without success to unseat the Parliamentarian forces that held it. While a minor skirmish, the outcome would foreshadow the broader struggle for the country.
Today, the town of Warwick is under siege of another kind, one that might similarly decide where the divided nation is headed after an escalation in the political drama over Brexit.
The UK is witnessing an historic period of upheaval that has invited comparisons with events almost 400 years ago. Parliament has been suspended — illegally, a court in Scotland ruled on Wednesday. The British prime minister is threatening to flout the law to get his way while lawmakers on all sides are in open revolt and Ireland’s future, north and south, is at stake.
Illustration: Yusha
Even the queen has become embroiled in the standoff. Violence is brewing, with scuffles outside Parliament earlier this month and a government document warning of public disorder from food and fuel shortages should the country crash out of the EU without a deal.
Lawmakers last week channeled an event from the run-up to the civil war in the House of Commons to protest the so-called prorogation of the legislature. Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, one of the main architects of the vote to leave the EU, has described the present constitutional crisis as the worst since that tumultuous period.
A tour through some English counties scarred by the conflict suggests he might be right. With positions hardening and no obvious release for rising tensions, it is anybody’s guess where the Brexit dilemma ends.
Voters in Warwick opposed leaving the EU, seeing a departure as a threat to a key employer — the automotive industry — and to the university town’s international outlook.
However, as a pro-EU bastion amid a sea of Brexit territory, Warwick is at odds with neighboring districts, the UK as a whole and with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative government. Those same divisions run throughout swaths of the country.
“If we get out of the current impasse without shots being fired, we will be doing better than I expected,” said Diane Purkiss, author of The English Civil War: A People’s History and a professor of English literature at Oxford University. “The question from here is whether we can at the last minute and in the eleventh hour muddle together some kind of final British compromise.”
With its timber framed houses, country parks and association with William Shakespeare, the county of Warwickshire is picture perfect England. Yet beneath the patina of Olde Worlde charm lie stark divisions in attitudes to Brexit.
Of course the UK has always diverged along political lines, from Thatcherism to Blairism. What attracts today’s comparisons with the 17th century is the constitutional chaos on top. Then, the country chose sides as Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s Puritans asserted authority over King Charles I and his Catholic household in a standoff over religion and power that ultimately led to war and regicide.
In an echo of Brexit’s patchwork of “leave” and “remain” voting areas, the civil war cleaved along the lines of individual towns and cities depending on which way they declared, for Parliament or the King.
Indeed, the political map of the Brexit vote resembles the distribution of support for both sides in the civil war, Stefan Collignon, a professor at the London School of Economics, wrote in March last year.
In Warwickshire, Stratford-upon-Avon was sandwiched between Parliamentarian and Royalist forces, and took in casualties from the war’s first major battle at Edgehill.
Stratford, Shakespeare’s birthplace, is a 20-minute drive to the southwest of Warwick, but a different world in its Brexit outlook. Whereas Warwick and its surroundings are home to workers from the nearby Jaguar Land Rover plants and left-leaning, pro-European students and academics from Warwick University, Stratford relies on tourism, the hospitality industry and foreign workers to staff it.
Warwick voted 59 percent to 41 percent in favor of remaining in the EU. Stratford voted 52 percent to 48 percent to “Leave,” bang in line with the country as a whole.
Walking around Stratford, past the Tudor houses and boats on the river Avon, there is little outward evidence of tension. That is no comfort to Sophie Clausen, an artist and author originally from Denmark who first came to Britain as an art student more than 20 years ago.
For Clausen, that sense of indifference cannot be excused by any amount of Brexit fatigue and is the most worrying aspect of all.
“People switch off, they don’t care, and that’s really dangerous. People say they just want Brexit over with, but I don’t think it will ever end. Because if it doesn’t happen, the divisions will get even deeper and people who voted Leave will be even more angry. No one knows the way out any more,” she said.
Johnson has a little over a month to try and strike a new deal with the EU that is palatable to enough Parliamentarians to enable Britain to leave the bloc in an orderly way on Oct. 31. If he fails to do so, he is now required by law to ask for an extension, something that would almost inevitably lead to the general election he wants to break the impasse.
Comparisons between Johnson and Charles I over their treatment of Parliament are unhelpful, according to Purkiss, the civil war author, since the king waited 11 years to recall the legislature rather than the present five weeks. Yet there is a common “persistent ongoing failure of compromise” that contributed to the descent into conflict, she said.
Other parallels lie in the existence of concurrent crises in “the three kingdoms” of England, Ireland and Scotland, and in the emergent print media’s alarmist headlines that mirror today’s social media posts, “weaponizing fear mongering,” Purkiss said.
“I don’t think people are taking this threat seriously enough,” she said in an interview at Keble College in Oxford, one block away from St Giles Church, which carries a plaque describing its damage in the civil war.
At root, Brexit is the symptom of a crisis of parliamentary democracy, with both main parties pushed to extremes and the middle ground erased, eroding willingness to reach consensus. That presents a challenge for politicians like Jack Rankin, selected to contest the Warwick and Leamington constituency for the Conservatives at the next election.
The district was held by the Conservatives for much of the 20th century, falling to Labour in 1997 as the Blair government came to power and has changed hands between the two parties since. Matt Western retook it for Labour in 2017 with a majority of just 1,200 votes.
His pro-European views were reinforced by a previous life as a marketing manager for French carmaker Peugeot in places like Vienna and Paris. Bridging the division “is very hard because both sides of the debate are becoming quite entrenched in their view. I’m really alarmed about what’s going on in society,” he said.
To win the seat from Labour, Rankin, who voted for Brexit, would have to appeal to a strongly anti-Brexit electorate.
He said that his experience on voter doorsteps shows “the overwhelming majority are fundamentally democrats and just want to get on with it.” The divisions are not as deep as commonly presented, he said in an email response to questions, and healing the Conservative rift “won’t happen until we deliver what we said we would.” He said the future is bright regardless of how Brexit plays out.
That might be wishful thinking. Jaguar Land Rover CEO Ralf Speth warned last year that a bad Brexit could put tens of thousands of jobs at risk. Warwick University’s vice chancellor Stuart Croft has called Brexit a “disaster” and said that losing access to international research networks could shut the UK out of the science vanguard and risk jobs.
The warnings were not lost on Barry Archer, a maker of clay models used in car industry design who has worked across Europe, most recently for Skoda in the Czech Republic.
He was at a “Stop the Coup” demonstration last week in Coventry, the city whose outskirts include Warwick University’s leafy campus, to protest the proroguing of Parliament. Archer was among the 200 or so who showed up.
His latest job was canceled as a result of the uncertainty over Brexit. His two adult sons feel their future is being settled without their say, with freedom of movement set to go in the name of the “will of the people.”
For Archer, Brexit is personal — his wife is German — but he still does not see any chance to stop it.
“The problem is it’s divided the country so much there’s going to be no easy way around it,” he said as an autumn wind blew in the city’s Friargate. “Damage to the foundation of who we are, what we are has been done. It’s just damage control now.”
Bernard Capp, an emeritus professor of history at Warwick, has seen the university’s development from its earliest days in the 1960s and still teaches a class on radicalism and the English Civil War. He sees parallels with the sort of polarization witnessed between 1640 and 1642, when the war broke out, and says that is a cause for concern.
During the civil war, Coventry was a Parliamentarian center, known for its extensive medieval city walls. Capp related that Charles I arrived in late summer 1642 on his way to raise an army and demanded entrance. The mayor of Coventry refused, the first real act of defiance before the fighting started.
“We should all be very wary because nobody wanted a civil war, nobody expected a civil war and look where that happened,” he said. Even at the war’s end, “no one thought there would be a revolution and the king would get his head chopped off, and yet that’s where it ended up,” Capp said.
“So no one knows what the final destination will be once you get into a constitutional crisis,” he said.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS