After Banqiao Senior High School’s “manskirt week” caused a stir in May, the school has done the right thing by announcing on Monday that male students would be allowed to wear skirts to school when the new semester starts in September.
Critics called it a mistake and asked whether male students wearing wigs and makeup is next, but it is encouraging to see the school continuing to stand with the students.
What was just an in-school exercise to challenge gender stereotypes turned into a national debate when New Taipei City Councilor Lin Kuo-chun (林國春) questioned the school’s principal and said that he did so on behalf of parents who might not want their children to attend the school.
Fortunately, the general reaction toward the students seemed positive. The school was supportive, while about 50 people showed up in skirts at New Taipei City Plaza on the last day of manskirt week. National Taiwan University and National Taiwan Normal University students also held manskirt events in support of the high schoolers. Even President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) voiced her support at a public event.
The school’s decision is unprecedented in Taiwan, and should be counted as another milestone for the nation’s achievements in promoting diversity and tolerance, despite a majority of the public last year voting unfavorably in two referendums about gender equity education, especially regarding homosexuality.
It has been 19 years since junior-high student Yeh Yung-chih (葉永鋕) died under mysterious circumstances after being bullied for his “effeminate” behavior, which led to the passage of the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法) 15 years ago, but it seems that some people’s opinions have not progressed much.
Parents remain overly cautious about gender equity education, often taking material out of context, while groups against LGBT+ rights last year spread rumors that such education would make students promiscuous or make them gay.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) and civic groups on Sunday called on the government to work harder to achieve gender equality in schools, saying that public opinion remains hostile toward teachers who try to implement gender equity education, making it hard for them to do their jobs.
It is understandable that much of society grew up at times when it was common to make fun of others for being different, but that is especially why educating children about gender equity and diversity is so important. The nation needs open-minded, creative young people who can think for themselves and respect diversity to take the reins when the time comes.
That the high school’s administration did not bow to pressure and instead amended its dress code shows that times are changing, and students’ voices are heard and respected. It sets an example for other schools and shows that even if opponents try to eliminate gender equity education in classrooms, the students will take it upon themselves to use activities such as manskirt week to promote tolerance.
Some might say that it is acceptable for high schoolers to speak up for gender equity, but that junior-high and elementary-school students are “too young” to learn about such matters.
Teaching material should be age-specific, but in this case it is never too early to learn about why it is okay for a boy to wear a skirt to school.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS