A solitary figure in a white shirt and black trousers clutches a bag and stands in front of a column of halted tanks, a cluster of street lights floating to one side like balloons. The man’s shoulders are rounded, almost passive in front of the four tanks whose gun barrels are raised as if in an ironic salute.
Thirty years on from the violent crushing of pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square, the man’s identity remains unknown; it is by no means certain he is still alive.
However, the photograph that captured his solitary moment of dissent in June 1989 remains one of the most memorable images of the past century, known universally as Tank Man.
Illustration: Mountain People
Jeff Widener was not the only photographer to capture the scene, but it is his image — listed as one of Time magazine’s 100 most influential of all time — that has become the most famous.
“Every Tank Man photo has a different flavor. I think I was lucky I was using such a fine-grained film. It allowed it to be blown up larger. I think mine also has a more ‘Gandhi’ feel. He looks more vulnerable: a common man asking a question, like: ‘Why are you doing this?’ My feeling is that this guy had no concern for his safety. He was fed up and just didn’t care. He just wanted answers.”
Speaking to the Observer before the 30th anniversary of the protests, Widener recalled that the picture was almost not taken, as circumstances conspired against him at almost every turn.
UNFORTUNATE EVENTS
On the day Tank Man was taken, June 5, 1989, the then-Associated Press (AP) photographer had flu and was concussed from a blow to the head the night before that had destroyed one of his cameras. He had also run out of film and only managed to secure a roll by asking a US exchange student from whose hotel balcony he was working to scrounge some for him.
Changing lenses in the midst of the encounter, later reimagined in Lucy Kirkwood’s play and television series Chimerica, Widener almost missed the moment, managing to shoot just three pictures before the man with the shopping bags was hustled away.
Of those three photographs, two were not in sharp enough focus. The third, however, made Widener and his unknown subject famous.
“I broke the cardinal rule. I ran out of film. So I asked this kid [the exchange student] to get me more. He’s gone for hours and when he comes back he has one roll of Fuji 100 ISO,” a much slower speed of film than Widener was used to.
Widener decided to take a nap, but was woken by the sound of tanks.
“There’s these four tanks and I think it is a nice composition. Then this guy comes out of nowhere. At first I’m thinking this guy is going to screw up my composition, but the student is shouting: ‘They’re gonna kill him, they’re gonna kill him!’” Widener said.
“He’s just standing there. I’m watching, watching, watching. He’s a long way off,” he said.
Risking missing the photo, Widener, now 62, rushed to grab a teleconverter to double the focal length of his lens, returning to the balcony moments before Tank Man disappeared.
He had just enough time to take one shot in focus, before asking the student to smuggle the film out of the hotel to the US embassy in his underwear from where it could be sent to his office.
It was a tremendous coup for a photographer who was not even based in China, but had been called in to help out the AP’s Beijing office at a time of huge political turmoil.
The unknown Chinese man’s face-off with the tanks came after weeks of demonstrations calling for democratic reforms that had rocked the capital.
Protesters on hunger strike had started to occupy Tiananmen Square on May 13, 1989, and within days they were more than 1 million strong. The army was sent in, and on June 4 soldiers and tanks opened fire on protesters, killing and injuring thousands.
That day, Widener and his colleagues had drawn straws for the night shift. “I remember as I cycled to the square with the correspondent saying I had a bad feeling,” Widener said.
After the carnival-like atmosphere of the preceding days, they could see people putting steel traffic dividers in the middle of the main boulevard.
“I was beginning to feel stressed,” he said.
As AP’s Southeast Asia picture editor born in southern California, he had had little experience of photographing violence. His sense of foreboding was quickly justified.
“I see this guy with a long white beard and he’s laughing. He’s wearing this big heavy coat. And underneath there’s a big bloody hatchet. And that’s a shock,” Widener said.
Continuing toward the Great Hall of the People, Widener could hear screaming and yelling before seeing an armored vehicle moving at speed “with sparks flying off the treads.”
He found himself in the midst of Chinese security forces in their attempts to reoccupy the square and quash the protest movement.
In the chaos that followed he recalls a burning armored vehicle and students with guns taken from soldiers, a dead soldier in the street and another man on fire. As he was getting ready to take a picture a lump of concrete stuck his camera.
‘I WAS TOO SCARED’
“It was like Bugs Bunny. Stars circling. The top of my camera is ripped off and there’s blood coming down,” he said. “I’m totally whacked out, but I’m still trying to get photos when finally I decide to pick up a random bicycle and get back to the office.”
“I could have grabbed another camera and gone out again, but I was too scared. I was shutting down. I had the feeling if I went back I’d die,” he said.
However, the following morning the office received a message from New York. His bosses said they did not want anyone to take unnecessary risks, but asked if it would be possible to photograph the army’s occupation of the square.
“I’m having a nervous breakdown, but, anyway, I’m there to take pictures, so I get on the bicycle,” Widener said.
Getting close to the Beijing Hotel, overlooking the square, he could hear gunfire and see tanks at the intersection, aware of the long lens and camera hidden on him.
“I know there will be secret police at the hotel who’ve been chasing journalists with cattle prods. I get into the lobby and think they’re going to bust me when I see this American exchange student,” he said.
Hailing the young man like a friend, Widener persuaded him to take him to his room, where he took the picture that we all know today.
Widener has since gone on to cover stories all over the world, from Syria to the South Pole.
However, Tank Man stays with him.
“I live with it every day,” he said. “Because no one knows where to find him, they come to me. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not saying I’m Tank Man, but because no one knows who he was, I’m the next best thing, but I can only say what I saw.”
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS