Vote China out of Taiwan
There were no elections in the ancient age, but war to change administration of government. At that time, every mentor planned to maneuver behind the scenes and control the field from a great distance away. Today, most chiefs of staff rely on cyberwarfare.
The nine-in-one elections on Nov. 24 has been called a war of democracy against communism; Taiwan against China.
Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) was nominated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and became its Kaohsiung mayoral candidate on May 21. He resigned as general manager of Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing Corp in 2016 and contested the KMT chairperson election last year, finishing fourth in number of votes. Due to the strong involvement of and promotion by Chinese media, Han’s popularity has soared within a short period of time. Now, he is No. 1 among the KMT candidates in the elections.
Han presented a lot of arguable campaign policies.
He said he would increase Kaohsiung’s population from 4 million to 5 million in 10 years, but did not know the current population is only 2.77 million.
He said his government would not allow any political movements in the city, but would focus efforts on promoting economics, building a Ferris wheel, building a casino in Qijin District (旗津), recognizing celebrities such as Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊) and developing Taiping Island (太平, Itu Aba).
He is a typical example of a person who enjoys democracy, but abuses it. He emphasizes that his policies can be carried out once people accept the so-called “1992 consensus,” after which investors from China will be more than happy to migrate to Kaohsiung.
“I know, he is a gangster, but I want to vote for him,” KMT Central Committee member Chen Li-shi (陳麗旭) said. “He is not only a gangster. Even if you tell me that he is a murderer and an arsonist, I would still vote for him. If you tell me he is a thief, I would still vote for him. Even if he lies to me, I would still vote for him.”
What a diehard supporter. Unbelievable!
Han has based his entire campaign strategy, promises and policies on gaining endorsements from China. Nov. 24 will be a day to examine whether the modern cyberpromotion from overseas can effectively influence local elections. It will be a big insult to the democratic system if one who made fake promises and policies, tampered with the poem of the San Fong Palace god, and did not know the population of the city he campaigned in is elected mayor.
Yes, Taiwan has long been a testing ground for Chinese cyberattacks, there were about 100,000 online attacks from China per month last year.
China’s disinformation, financial support of certain candidates and sponsoring of TV and radio programs, as well as cyberattacks, are undermining the nine-in-one elections.
Now the campaigning is almost finished. Regardless of the outcomes, a big lesson will be learned about Taiwan’s democracy. Voters need to open their eyes to examine campaign policies and promises.
Elections are to vote for capable candidates with noble characters and personalities to serve the community. Let us vote for those candidates who can sincerely keep and carry out their promises and polices.
Vote for Taiwan. Let us vote China out of Taiwan.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS