In December 1966, Liu Tao (劉濤), daughter of then-Chinese state chairman Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇), wrote a “big character poster” under the title “Rebel against Liu Shaoqi, follow chairman Mao and carry out revolution all my life.” Less than a week later, she and her brother Liu Yunzhen (劉允真) wrote another poster with the headline “Look, the ugly soul of Liu Shaoqi.”
During China’s Cultural Revolution, countless sycophants put their parents through hell by drawing a line between themselves and their parents to demonstrate their loyalty to Chinese Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Such acts often caused irreparable rifts between family members.
Chinese film director Zhang Yimou (張藝謀) said: “When you talk about things like ‘selling out’ and ‘denouncing,’ in those days they were commonplace. It was called ‘drawing a line.’ Drawing a line between yourself and your father’s generation — it happened all over the place... I recently had a conversation with some young filmgoers and they asked whether it was not really too cold-hearted to do such a thing. I said that cold is the wrong word for it. It was hot-blooded. What was it? It was devotion. For someone to draw a line out of their devotion to the times and their beliefs, that was drawing a line in a hot-blooded way. So it was something that happened in those days in particular. Nowadays, a lot of young people who see my film think it seems very special, but actually anyone who lived through those times knows that things like that really happened a lot.”
Taiwan-based bakery cafe 85°C was forced to draw a line between itself and Taiwan just because President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had a cup of coffee at one of its stores in Los Angeles.
In December last year, broadcasts of the TV drama series My Dear Boy (我的男孩), starring and produced by Taiwanese actress Ruby Lin (林心如), were halted in China because the production was subsidized by the Ministry of Culture. To get the ban lifted, Lin was forced to draw a line between herself and Taiwan.
Early this month, Taiwanese actress Vivian Sung (宋芸樺) had to do the same thing, for the sake of the Chinese market.
During the Cultural Revolution, people were forced to draw a line between themselves and their parents to show their devotion to the state. What Zhang calls “something special that happened in those days” is now being revived in China, where Taiwanese businesses and entertainers are forced to draw a line between themselves and their “mother” — Taiwan — and express their devotion to China instead.
The kind of lunacy that happened under the centralized rule of Mao, who fostered a cult of personality, has reappeared under the rule of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who likewise promotes worship of himself.
It is said that history does not repeat itself, but what happens later often strongly resembles what happened before.
It is also said that those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad. The Cultural Revolution held China back for at least 20 years.
Will the lunacy of today’s new cultural revolution cause Xi’s “Chinese dream” to crumble and fall? Only time will tell.
Yu Kung is a businessman.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS