As Typhoon Nesat approached Taiwan on Saturday, it caused floods in Pingtung County. To make sure I could attend an international conference on Sunday, I traveled north from Tainan earlier than planned and stayed the night in New Taipei City.
With the typhoon landing on Saturday night, the wind grew.
I worried that there would be super-strong winds on Sunday and that it would be declared a holiday.
Local government leaders were doubtless worried that the typhoon would cause grievous damage and provoke public resentment, so, to avoid the traffic and safety problems that the storm might cause, all municipalities announced that work and classes would be canceled on Sunday.
However, when I got up early on Sunday morning, the sky was clear and sunny, with a mild breeze and no rain. At first I thought we must be in the eye of the storm, but after quite a long time the weather did not worsen and the sky was cloudless as far as the eye could see.
I checked for news about where Nesat was headed, only to find that it had already moved far away. Disappointingly, the international conference had already been called off.
If typhoon holidays were a bit more flexible, such disappointments could be avoided.
The money needed to invite international academics had already been spent, so if there were no worries about safety, it would make sense to go ahead and hold the event. However, the rules about typhoon holidays leave little room for maneuvering.
If the system remains unchanged, there will be no end to the problem of misjudged decisions about typhoon days off.
It would make sense for the economic functioning of society to improve the decisionmaking mechanism for typhoon holidays.
When local government leaders announce a day off because of a typhoon, they could add a supplementary notice saying, for example, that if there is no wind and rain at 7am the next morning and if people are not in danger, then different government departments can decide what to do. This would prevent mistaken or misjudged decisions about typhoon holidays.
This is by no means the first time that a misjudged decision has been made about a typhoon holiday. In the past, people have tended to blame inaccurate weather forecasts, in some cases leaving officials at the Central Weather Bureau with no option but to tender their resignations.
A more reasonable explanation would be that the weather is always changing, so that while some aspects of it can be predicted, others cannot easily be forecast with 100 percent accuracy. That is why atmospheric sciences speak of a “butterfly effect”: The idea that a butterfly’s wings disturbing the air in Beijing can affect the weather in New York.
One example of this unpredictability took place in southern Taiwan a few years ago when heavy rainfall set in early one morning, but local government leaders had not made a timely announcement that work and classes would be canceled.
The officials were immediately taken to task on Internet forums by people saying that the decision to announce a typhoon holiday had been made too late for them to act accordingly. Following that experience, decisionmaking on typhoon holidays has become increasingly “efficient.”
If announcements are made earlier, there are likely to be more instances of misjudged typhoon holidays. This is not a normal state of affairs, because besides the weather being difficult to predict 100 percent accurately, geographical factors make it even harder to make across-the-board decisions.
For example New Taipei City is far from Tainan, Kaohsiung and Pingtung County, so the weather in these places can be different, making misjudgements even more likely.
Perhaps the public expects and depends on the government, including local leaders, to decide typhoon holidays as early and quickly as possible. This abnormal “public opinion phenomenon” is seen as normal in Taiwan, but this characteristic of our political culture is unique in the international community. For example, in the US and Japan — which are advanced countries — they only have rules for canceling lessons to ensure schoolchildren’s safety, not for canceling work.
An ideal system for making decisions about typhoon holidays should be flexible. It should allow individuals, departments and businesses to make their own decisions about whether to cancel work, depending on their particular weather conditions, rather than having local governments shoulder all the responsibility.
Local leaders are not weather experts, so more flexible systems for deciding typhoon holidays are surely the right way to go.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the Department of Political Science and Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS