Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) often says the wrong thing at the wrong time and loses his temper — only to apologize later and try to put things right. However, this does not necessarily mean he is in the wrong when he explodes.
Ko blew up after the discovery last week of illegally logged cypress trees in an environmental protection zone in the Neihu District (內湖) and an illegal mountain road that had reportedly been built with city funds to transport the logs. District police allowed the logs to be shipped off the site after it was claimed that the logs were naturally occurring driftwood legally collected in Taitung County.
Ko said it was unbelievable that the lumber was “floating wood” (漂流木) that somehow “floated” from Taitung County to a Neihu mountainside.
Over the past week, the Neihu district administrator has been investigated and detained in connection with the scandal.
Ko’s way of handling these issues may be disputable, but he has highlighted the problems of illegal logging and floating wood. The illegal logging business is an issue that concerns everyone because it impacts the nation’s forests and natural environment.
How could it be that so many of the “wind-toppled trees” that end up as floating wood after being washed down mountains have no roots or branches? Why are the top and root ends of such trees so neat and even, and the trees just short enough to fit on a truck? Why is it that only precious cypress and camphor trees seem to end up being blown down or uprooted by wind and storms, and why is their bark almost completely intact despite their long and bumpy journeys down mountainsides and into rivers?
There is a lot of legitimate wind-toppled wood in forests because trees can be weakened by pests and internal rot. However, much of this wood naturally breaks up into smaller pieces.
Many hikers know that illegal loggers used to fell trees, cut them into pieces and then leave them lying in the forest until the bark disintegrated naturally before bringing the wood down the mountains. However, such practices were easily uncovered at mountain checkpoints, forcing the unscrupulous to devise new methods to disguise their trade.
“Floating wood” refers to wood felled naturally that floats outside of government-owned land. Collecting such wood from public forests or rivers is illegal, except in certain circumstances, such as after a typhoon — and even then residents have to wait one month to collect it. Otherwise Forestry Bureau personnel mark the wood for collection and sale by the government.
However, before Forestry Bureau staff have time to register the driftwood, illegal loggers grab it. A small amount of this so-called “driftwood” is intentionally left to be registered by the bureau, and according to the rules of the trade, it is bought by local loggers. Any additional costs are simply the fee for “legalizing” their illegal logging operations.
Illegal logging has a negative impact on forests. Mountainsides slowly erode as tree roots help keep soil in place. The loss of trees and soil means more water runs off and less is absorbed into the ground. Torrential rains erode the soil and cause landslides that silt up rivers.
Many will remember the photographs of piles of trees and branches that Typhoon Morakot washed off the mountains in Taitung County in 2009. The storm caused the largest amount of driftwood pile-ups ever seen in the Taitung area. While sales of the wood eventually enriched the government, the damage to the environment left the entire nation poorer.
It may begin with illegal loggers stealing trees, but such operations have a knock-on effect that harms the nation’s mountains, rivers, valleys and people. Anyone who understands the consequences of illegal logging is surely just as furious as Ko.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of